Well as the two offences that mr kalief is facing, one, under the terrorism act and also the bomb hoax there now, of course, will be an additional penalty to serve, and that is for escaping from prison. What kind of future do you think this guy has . How long will his sentence be and how secure will this prison be . Well, i think he is going to be the most guarded prisoner in the prison system once hes been returned to lawful custody. I returned to lawful custody. I think hell undoubtedly be going to a prison where hell be under the most strictest conditions. And that will be very much looked at around how much time he is allowed to either associate with other prisoners or even to have sort of recreation time. Obviously, in terms of the offences, you know, weve got the common law offence of escaping from custody. It would down to obviously the would be down to obviously the courts to look at exactly the reasons and the motives why hes done this. But the fact hes been caught so quickly
To her son, kim, wholl be telling her how she is and what the world needs to do about burma. And this is a World Exclusive tv interview by by the sun. And also, can you believe it . Weve had people working from home now they want to work from the beach. Really are they working . I dont think so. Were going to be exposed doing that. And the councils whove agreed to the staff working from the beach. Nice work if you can get it. Nice work if you can get it. It certainly is. Or not. No work . No, cant do well exactly. Sunbathing and weve got an all star cast for our newspaper review this morning. Weve got mark director review this morning. Weve got mark of director review this morning. Weve got mark of institute ector review this morning. Weve got mark of institute of or general of the institute of economic and former Economic Affairs and former labour matthew lasso. Labour adviser matthew lasso. You wont want to miss what theyve say. And of theyve got to say. And of course, as always, we
Well as the two offences that mr kalief is facing, one, under the terrorism act and also the bomb hoax there now, of course, will be an additional penalty to serve, and that is for escaping from prison. What kind of future do you think this guy has . How long will his sentence be and how secure will this prison be . Well, i think he is going to be the most guarded prisoner in the prison system once hes been returned to lawful custody. I returned to lawful custody. I think hell undoubtedly be going to a prison where hell be under the most strictest conditions. And that will be very much looked at around how much time he is allowed to either associate with other prisoners or even to have sort of recreation time. Obviously, in terms of the offences, you know, weve got the common law offence of escaping from custody. It would down to obviously the would be down to obviously the courts to look at exactly the reasons and the motives why hes done this. But the fact hes been caught so quickly
Thessue in this case collection of this information is a search as it disturbs peoples longstanding practical expectations that their longstanding actions will remain private. You want ushe rule to adopt in this case assuming we keep a miller, miller and smith versus maryland on the book. The role we seek is longerterm aggregations of cell phone is a search and requires a warrant. We are not asking the court to overturn those cases. We think the lesson to be john is that any the lesson to be drawn is that any extension of predigital to this digital data how would you distinguish miller . Miller requires more limited that it was voluntarily conveyed and words created by the passing of instruments in the stream of commerce to transfer funds. What we have here is more sensitive and less voluntary. Why is it more sensitive . Why is cell site Location Information more sensitive than bank records, which particularly today, when a lot of people do not use cash much, a bank record will disclos
At issue in this case the collection of this information is a search as it disturbs peoples longstanding practical expectations that their longterm movements in public and private spaces will remain private. What is the rule you want us to adopt in this case, assuming we keep a miller, miller and smith versus maryland on the book. The rule we seek is longerterm aggregations of cell phone location and information is a search and requires a warrant. We are not asking the court to overturn those cases. We think the lesson to be john to be drawn is that any extension of predigital precedents to these kinds of digital data must rest on their own. How would you distinguish miller . Involves more limited records. They can reveal more sensitive information. As this court held, they were voluntarily conveyed in that they were created by the passing of instruments in the stream of commerce to transfer funds. What we have here is more sensitive and less voluntary. Why is it more sensitive . Why i