Security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. Regina youre welcome to a conference on harlow you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that china is going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law onto because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels like is true and that a hong kong version reflects its understanding that hong kong to version which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is going ahead to
Protests joining me this week from hong kong is regina if a member of the citys Legislative Council and chair of the probate you Peoples Party will the communist authorities try to use this law as they have with other security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. I. Think you that youre welcome to a conference on how low you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations obliga
Ergo it was founded on a rape in a murder. Nothing changed so we said all response to the situation still killing people is sad every other day people kill each other black people kill each other so it was just no way that people are going to just sit back and allow children to shut down Law Enforcement this country doesnt work for us it doesnt function for us this is cant me happening in america. Michael brown say is nice. To buy one bed a boy. Just shouldnt be. There margy rather frightening. For 3 years you should pay as man. We miss you we love you you set off a revolution. What his whole country for his whole world. The thing about my brow was before that it had been several decades is america at uprising like that you know and we got a missed opportunity i feel like with the ferguson situation. Was. Cut. To the people of all the praise yes you put. Judge you but. The real but. The state isnt for us this country doesnt work for us it doesnt function for as. You can talk what a mac
A maid in the shallows. Join me every thursday on the alex simon show and ill be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business im show business ill see you then. Ergo it was founded on a rape in a murder. Nothing changed so we said no response to these situations the killing. Is sad every other day people kill each other black people kill each other so it was just no way that people are going to just sit back and allow children to shut down Law Enforcement this country doesnt work for us it doesnt function for us this is cant be happening in america. Michael brown say his name. There by one bed a plea. To shouldnt be. There are people are fighting. For 3 years you should pay as man. We miss you we love you you set off a revolution. What his whole country for his whole world. The thing about my brow was before that it had been several decades is america at uprising like that you know and we got a missed opportunity i feel like with the ferguson situation. I. Could. Look. Up
Security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. Reduce that youre welcome to a conference on how low you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing is not everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels or plan is true and that the whole cold version reflects its understanding that hong kong to russia which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is goi