you have counter clock wise motion and rotation, that is why we see the spin-offs of tropical tornados. carley: there are pictures on social media that show like 15 or a guilty over dozen i weras destroyed at north perry airplane because of suspected tornados, so the damage is being felt in florida. janice: widespread throughout the state of florida. carley: let s go to phil phil keating, what are you seeing right now? it is finally raining steadily here, not quite yet the deluge issue but as janice was pointing out, last three hours have seen massive intenseification, it went from cat three 120 mile per hour
because right now, the u.s. not ready to use the football analogy, to spike the ball on this counteroffensive. ukraine has a big challenge ahead. they need to be able, as melissa is pointing out, to secure, hold, and then potentially sustain an advance. their objectives on the battlefield. the russians have the same problem. the ruzs suffering from lack of morale by all accounts, also have to be able to sustain and then advance back against the ukrainian forces. both of them may have challenges in the weeks ahead doing that. very much aware that winter is coming. positions on the battlefield may be solidified as the cold weather advances, so everybody trying to get the best advantage they can right now. the u.s. watching all of it very carefully, continuing to support ukraine s efforts but not yet ready to break out the champagne, if you with. they know both sides have a long
going to see is not very much information about the reasons for the search and any information about the ongoing investigation. and the reason i think that is the department of justice made very clear in court when this was raised that they couldn t produce much of anything. the judge on monday made his own statement that he really understood and sort of saw the problem the government had been pointing out, but none the less wanted to see what the government would propose. the best speculation i can offer, and i think it is speculation, is that the government follow through pretty much on what they had foreshadowed in court, that they really couldn t allow much of it out consistent with their concerns about the integrity of the investigation and the protection of confidential witnesses and that sort of thing.
a heavily-reductive version of the affidavit of, or the fbi laid out probable cause for a crime committed. i m not prepared to buy that the affidavit should be fully sealed, u.s. magistrate judge, saying, giving the justice to him in a week to describe redactions and expand what each piece of information could be secret. this comes after several news outlets, including cnn, asked the judge to unseal the affidavit that led to a search warrant resulting in fbi agents walking out of former president donald trump s home with boxes of classified material. a fishing expedition. reporter: the justice trauma, opposing this, echoing concerns from an earlier filing, where doj says, if disclosed, this would be a roadmap to the government s ongoing investigation, providing specific details about the likely course in a manner that is highly likely to cause endurance to the future steps. the head of the justice section, pointing out, the court already has probable cause of evidence of obstructio
something in court in a filing or in person. but they didn t say anything. no. they ve been saying everything on cable and on twitter and in other venues. they ve not done they had someone there, as you said, christina bobb, who was one of the people at the search, she was there when the fbi was searching. and look, you ve seen them say in some of these appearances on various networks, they ve said that they want to know who these witnesses were, they want to know who dropped the dime on the former president. and i get it. that s obviously anybody would want that. that is not something that the judge is going to allow. right? but the problem is as elie s pointing out, it depends on how you do these redactions. we have seen redacted versions of these documents and, you know, have been able to figure things out. we probably even in the unredacted versions, right, don? there wouldn t be names of witnesses. but it will say, you know, person a or person 1a or