financial ruin. is he right, jen? this reflects a concern within the party that he s not the only one that has raised it, about going too quickly progressive. a lot of the candidates have similar goals, they want to expand access to health care and make it more affordable. it s the pace you go. his concern is reflecting what a lot of people are talking about, at least people that i talk to. you ve been talking to voters in a key michigan county. what are they telling you? it s so interesting, to chris s point a moment ago, i was talking to a lot of reagan democrats in the precincts that went for obama but flipped to trump in macomb county, the spiritual home of reagan democrats. so many voters there felt really positive about the economy. while they have trump fatigue, they just don t see a clear alternative yet, because they don t want people messing with their health care. a lot of these people are union
republican rick wilson s tweet, fellow floridian, here it is p this is directed at donald trump. why don t you just use the n-word and get it over with? you re almost there. and you really want to. that jump the out ed out at me. there s something visceral about that feels like the truth. what do you think about that? you feel it because it is true. this is to karine s point a moment for the republican party but i think a moment for white america to also realize there s an inflection point here that we ve arrived at. we look at the african-american community, black americans obviously on the receiving end of the racism. we often frame it that way. there s a responsibility among white america to understand why this is racist. and i ll be honest with you, i knew it when the president said it, that s racist. but to understand exactly why takes understanding some of the elements of racism. i think white america right now
and the more witnesses that come out, the more data that comes out that disputes a previous account, now we ve got to move the goalpost. here s the thing that s the most astounding, giuliani and other lawyers for the president were involved in submitting answers to mueller on behalf of the president. that s what i m saying. why wouldn t their version of facts already be out there and done? you would be locked into that version completely. instead you have giuliani saying, well, the president said this or that and then giuliani says, well, i was only talking hypothetically. how do you talk hypothetically about conversations you ve had with the president of the united states? how often do lawyers speak hypothetically? brooke, great point. to paul s point a moment ago, if you re going to go out into the court of public opinion and there are reasons for lawyers to do it, you button those facts down. they cannot be attacked. there s confidence in what you re saying. if you don t d
that 4,000 known or suspected terrorist came through the border illegally. he said no, those were picked up at airports. kelly ann went on tv and said she misspoken. there is some legitimate fact checking going on not just with fox. this was a miss by the administration. to bill s point a moment an go they should get heat. there was some truth to the way they proposed these facts initially. it wasn t misleading. kelly ann corrected it. there are a lot of complex issues that come into play. i said brovo to fox and friends and smith. he went to the speech and said here is what he got wrong.
challenged her about the claims that 4,000 known or suspected terrorist came through the border illegally. he said no, those were picked up at airports. kelly ann went on tv and said she misspoken. there is some legitimate fact checking going on not just with fox. this was a miss by the administration. to bill s point a moment an go they should get heat. there was some truth to the way they proposed these facts initially. it wasn t misleading. kelly ann corrected it. there are a lot of complex issues that come into play. i said brovo to fox and friends and smith. he went to the speech and said here is what he got wrong.