against the train operators or the government. i against the train operators or the government- government. i absolutely agree. yeah, government. i absolutely agree. yeah. again. government. i absolutely agree. yeah. again. it government. i absolutely agree. yeah, again, it is government. i absolutely agree. yeah, again, it is ordinary i government. i absolutely agree. | yeah, again, it is ordinary people that are suffering the most disruption. the train companies, you have to look at the funding forming and how it works. in many ways, strikes don t cost them as much as you might think. but then there is no point striking striking is the only weapon that workers have to make their case and there is no point in going on strike if nobody is going to notice. you have to balance the need to make your case and to get your case heard, as a representative of the workforce, with not wanting to cause any more pain than is absolutely necessary. certainly any transport sector but of cours
reasons for handing down a whole life sentence one of the reasons included is murder of a police officer. this is the first time that murder by a police officer who used his position as a police officer in order to commit that murder has led to that sentence and that is quite striking. in to that sentence and that is quite strikinu. , ., ., , a to that sentence and that is quite strikinu. , ., ., , , striking. in i ust want to pick up on that striking. in i just want to pick up on that point striking. in i just want to pick up on that point that striking. in i just want to pick up on that point that rachel was i striking. in i just want to pick up - on that point that rachel was making about. of the whole life. there is about. of the whole life. there is a problem with language and a lot of the way we sentence criminals. we use the term life means life. and we talk about the northern echo which i was going to talk about as well which are photographs and illustrates at least 80 wom
is a temporary right to be in the united states, and suddenly the administration is saying, no, you can never come back in the country. you can t leave and come back. there s no due process rights for you. then that s it s going to be kind of hard. the administration can at any time it wants stop issuing new visas perhaps, but it s going to be hard. in the case of the executive order, if you read the decision, part of it is that judges disagree with the administration s position, but part of it the juz are clearly trying to make the point that they think this was sloppy. it was not rolled out well. it was not done well. then you get into the argument, do you just pull it back and rewrite it and say take two, but how that s a legal decision, you would make, and a process decision you would make, but in terms of personality and politics, of suffering, if he doesn t fight this one, will the president be perceived as losing big out of the box? there was also the decision unanim