opponent. we heard from devin nunes there, his office is now putting out a point by point rebuttal of the schiff memo. let s put this into context, this is the rebuttal to the rebuttal to the rebuttal, a dizzying situation here for our viewers. what devin nunes is saying is that he s standing by it, he says the american people clearly understand that the fbi used political dirt paid for by democrats. i ve been speaking with staff on the republican side of the aisle here and they re saying what the schiff memo really does, it really mentions hillary clinton or the dnc. they re sticking to their point here which is that this is a political document, that the fbi used in order to obtain a surveillance warrant on an american citizen. but we are talking about sensitive information here, obviously we look through this document, you see all the information that s been redac d redacted. that s right. i can t help but wonder about
reporter: that language disagreement, the president s declaration that any peace negotiations with the palestinians begin with the assumption that israel go back to the borders it had before the 1967 arab-israeli war. that sparked some pro israeli protests in new york today. president obama s basically negotiating for the palestinians. reporter: today, the president never uttered the phrase 1967 borders. but netanyahu did. while israel is prepared to make generous comprises for peace, it cannot go back to the 1967 lines because these lines are indefensible. reporter: netanyahu argued that the demographics make it impossible to go back. 130 settlements with more than 300,000 israelis reside outside those lines. the tension in the oval office was clear as the prime minister offered an almost point by point rebuttal to mr. obama s thursday speech. as i told you in our conversation, we don t have a lot of margin for error.