There was a referral to the Ethics Commission it was pending and they were warned that it would be that exact same search but not for the deleted emails, all emails, anything held within the custody of the Planning Department was my request, and i understand im not a political person. Like i only registered to vote which is weird but i never thought my vote mattered and i want to preface this i dont understand the politics but i understand the Ethics Commission and the relationship with the Sunshine Ordinance Task force. It seems to be strange. Because they didnt want to send the case here. I asked them to so there was accountability on behalf of those at the Planning Department and our faith in government is there is accountability and responsibility and after six hearings with the sunshine ordinance and quite a long process i can tell you that he was given notice. Absolutely. He sent whoever was in charge of sunshine ordinance complaints to the first hearing and to the second hearing
At that hearing and he was taking over lulu wongs position and acting agent for mr. John rahaim. He knew about it all along so the order went to john rahaim. He was in receipt of it so to say he wasnt given notice or ability to be heard wasnt the case at all. He cheese people to hand. Handle it and they didnt handle it at all. This is john rahaim. This is from the bay guardian of last year. Planning in San Francisco is a blood sport. Hes talking about war here. The war was to push the project forward and deny me my question is what documents double havent been produced to you at this time . Well, the search terms werent completed in their intriernity. The closest was the second cd i was given but put [inaudible] avenue in quotes which means has to be [inaudible] avenue and only return those documents but who spells out avenue. It was so minimal. If they returned the search terms in the entirety this would have been settled but now the project is approved. These are my records request t
Guardian of last year. Planning in San Francisco is a blood sport. Hes talking about war here. The war was to push the project forward and deny me my question is what documents double havent been produced to you at this time . Well, the search terms werent completed in their intriernity. The closest was the second cd i was given but put [inaudible] avenue in quotes which means has to be [inaudible] avenue and only return those documents but who spells out avenue. It was so minimal. If they returned the search terms in the entirety this would have been settled but now the project is approved. These are my records request to view files so it wasnt possible i missed anything. I was there a lot, at the Planning Department, and i needed to keep track of what was going on. Here is a letter after the second compliance and Amendments Committee no, the education outreach committee, where i made this request of the names they needed the files for and what the search terms were and what the searc
Delivered to you. Absolutely. What are those they complied with the lasted search that he mentioned and the fourth cd i was given and after six hearings knowing there was a referral to the Ethics Commission it was pending and they were warned that it would be that exact same search but not for the deleted emails, all emails, anything held within the custody of the Planning Department was my request, and i understand im not a political person. Like i only registered to vote which is weird but i never thought my vote mattered and i want to preface this i dont understand the politics but i understand the Ethics Commission and the relationship with the Sunshine Ordinance Task force. It seems to be strange. Because they didnt want to send the case here. I asked them to so there was accountability on behalf of those at the Planning Department and our faith in government is there is accountability and responsibility and after six hearings with the sunshine ordinance and quite a long process i
Informational predict only one capital request for the work through 2016 thats correct youre only requesting dollars for one fiscal year . Keith Martini Department staff this stable shows the request last year 200,000 for last years process for the 20152016 fiscal year were also proposing additional funding for the pavement to Parks Program in their not capital requests their funding that will be used for materials and supplies and other sorts of expenditures that wish noted specifically sxal not shown on the table okay. Commissioner antonini. I will move to approve the budget. Second. Commissioners there is a motion and a second to approve your budget and work program. Commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and passes you on item 9 academy of Art University update informational update and progress report. Thank y