if you look at that hearing the democrats scored zero points going after their credibility and being able to disparage their comments and being able to say that is just not true. howard: somebody often is lying in these kinds of investigations. didn t the hearing go into tawdry territory when march juror very taylor greene started showing sexual images from hunter biden s laptop? i don t know i would personally have been able to do it. it was highly salacious. it helped dry home the point of, hunter biden part of the testimony from the whistle-blowers is that he claimed a 10,000-dollar business expense for a golf membership, they testified no, it was for a sex club. it was highly salacious. i don t know it scored a lot of points. democrats didn t refute it was true. it was on the laptop. it was hunter biden s laptop. that is what he was doing, the smartest guy in the world according to joe biden. howard: now the investigators,
person s account that nothing criminal happened and downplayed it. that shows criminal happened and downplayed it. that shows the tenure of that article that shows the tenure of that article and what they were trying to achieve article and what they were trying to achieve and what has been a long standing campaign by rupert murdoch long standing campaign by rupert murdoch to undermine the bbc. no, it hasn t. murdoch to undermine the bbc. no, it hasn t- what murdoch to undermine the bbc. no, it hasn t. what the sun did in its first it hasn t. what the sun did in its first article it hasn t. what the sun did in its first article was it hasn t. what the sun did in its first article was to it hasn t. what the sun did in its first article was to point - it hasn t. what the sun did in its first article was to point out i it hasn t. what the sun did in its first article was to point out the i first article was to point out the problem first article was to point out the probl
be more interested in asking him about how much was planned. she keeps bringing him back to lock down. did you plan for lockdown? did you plan for the impact of that customer and he said no, we didn t. no western government as far as he knows did, but he says that is because the focus was always on a flu pandemic. full the flu pandemic needed an entirely different set of things. we wouldn t have had a lot done, we wouldn t have had such a massive economic shock. he keeps bringing it back to his point of, at least we had the public spending in a good place so we could actually deal with this. catherine, thank you. let sjust will be some showers in the forecast and it is going to turn let s er. will be some showers in the forecast and it is going to turn let s just update you on a story, one of our catherine, thank you. let sjust update you on a story, one of our top stories, that missing submersible on its way to try and top stories, that missing submersible on its way to try and find t
well, they could be, of course. and to charles s point that he is a defense lawyer s worst nightmare, of course because he s never going to keep his mouth closed. there is no evidence of that in the years and years and years of not just politics biden business, every time he faced legal issues he has repeatedly made a point of himself in public. because internally, he cares about is a general electorate. or least not the general electorate perhaps but the republican electorate, for the moment, anyway. so, he s trying to in fact talk that jury, a jury that he is convincing that this is just politics. this is just a hoax. this is not real. don t pay attention to this. that may, of course, change of indictments really do come. a priority at that point is going to be a different one, presumably. but for the moment it is politics for him. and he is trying to influence, in effect, the jury that he sees as being most important at the moment. we will be watching. peter baker and char
guess where one runs their mouth? on the podium, on a campaign trail, which is exactly where he is, peter. these investigations are going on. and he is out there campaigning. how do these two things coincide? because indictments could be coming down the pike. well, they could be, of course. and to charles s point that he is a defense lawyer s worst nightmare, of course because he s never going to keep his mouth closed. there is no evidence of that in the years and years and years of not just politics biden business, every time he faced legal issues he has repeatedly made a point of himself in public. because internally, he cares about is a general electorate. or least not the general electorate perhaps but the republican electorate, for the moment, anyway. so, he s trying to in fact talk that jury, a jury that he is