there is still the stake civilian nuclear power which is another hangover from the soviet days. all of this technology. that hangover from the soviet days. all of this technology. hangover from the soviet days. all of this technology. that times only a few weeks of this technology. that times only a few weeks ago of this technology. that times only a few weeks ago is of this technology. that times only a few weeks ago is reporting - a few weeks ago is reporting on ukrainian a few weeks ago is reporting on ukrainian saying if we haven t given up our ukrainian saying if we haven t given up our nuclear weapons, russia wouldn t up our nuclear weapons, russia wouldn t have it made it. that was the point wouldn t have it made it. that was the point of wouldn t have it made it. that was the point of the nuclear deterrent, so areas the point of the nuclear deterrent, so areas in the point of the nuclear deterrent, so areas in the south of the country talking so areas in th
broke that there was a deal on daca and other things with no mention of the wall and that it was another chuck and nancy deal, part of me wondered, wait, are they trying to jam the president to ensure that he does do a deal on daca that also doesn t include the border wall? i wonder if this is some very, like, superb chuck schumer/nancy pelosi negotiating in public. because now the white house is now on the defensive trying to defend trying to say, no, no, no. we are going to do the border wall. but are they really? ron, in my ron, in my experi experienced players like schumer and pelosi, do not mischaracterize what is actually said because they want to continue to have credible meetings with their counter parts in government. and so to jonathan s point of wouldn t it be smart for them to say this even if trump maybe did that specifically agree to it,
pelosi negotiating in public. because now the white house is now on the defensive trying to defend trying to say, no, no, no. we are going to do the border wall. but are they really? ron, in my ron, in my exper experienced players like schumer and pelosi, do not mischaracterize what is actually said because they want to continue to have credible meetings with their counter parts in government. and so to jonathan s point of wouldn t it be smart for them to say this even if trump maybe did that specifically agree to it, my reading of it based on these players is that trump did agree to this at the table. and now after the dinner and after that statement came up from schumer and pelosi, everybody in the white house is telling him you ve got to run away from this. just more evidence that the white house staff can t leave president trump unsupervised. i absolutely believe chuck