has now been reduced down to 11 so they have been some individual legal challenges because the judge said on friday there was no legal basis to make a general measure to stop the fight but there were appeals on human rights and modern slavery. dominic raba said this will reduce the trade in human misery, across our borders dominic raab. the dover mp natalie elphick also said that channel crossings put lives at risk and she said it is disappointing to see the courts being misused, in her words, disappointing to see the courts being misused, in herwords, but disappointing to see the courts being misused, in her words, but we should stress that what is being tested here is a point of law. in terms of the time, friday, five o clock, it was actually later than that, when are we going to hear from thejudge? that, when are we going to hear from the “udue? ,, ., that, when are we going to hear from the “ude? ,, ., , the judge? similar time. the case is likel to the judge? similar time.
a recording of trump saying and we ve heard this with our own ears saying to the secretary of state of georgia, just find me 11,780 votes and i ll do the rest. when we hear all of that, the chances are he will be found guilty. it s going to be political either way. just a point of law, and i want to keep this brief, because there s so much else i want to talk to you about, professor tribe, butjust on a point of law, as i understand it, even if donald trump were found guilty of criminal offences and he is, of course, also being investigated in new york state, and i believe there is some sort of investigation of his role after election night in georgia, as well but even if ultimately he s found guilty of offences, that is not going to bar him from running for the presidency again, is it, just on a point of law? on a point of law, you re correct, if the offences are tax offences, but one of the key offences is aiding and abetting an insurrection, and under the united states
a decision to give him a bye and to essentially say that he is above the law will look political as well. it seems to me that the least dangerous course is to follow all of the evidence where it leads. of course, it will ultimately be up to a jury to decide whether the chief of staff meadows, or whether giuliani, or whether trump or anybody in his circle was guilty of trying to undo a fair election but when the evidence is presented, when we hear a recording of trump saying and we ve heard this with our own ears saying to the secretary of state of georgia, just find me 11,780 votes and i ll do the rest. when we hear all of that, the chances are he will be found guilty. it s going to be political either way. just a point of law, and i want to keep this brief, because there s so much else i want to talk to you about, professor tribe, butjust on a point of law, as i understand it, even if donald trump were found
are particularly vulnerable to the coronavirus and children who live with another person in their household who has a health condition which means they have asked a press immune system. that s the latest on the eligibility for vaccination. the devolved government continuing to make the point strongly that the best thing people can do to help play their part in this wave of the pandemic is to get their booster vaccination if they have not already. the latest government figures suggest northern ireland has the highest infection rate of the uk s for nations. to give you an idea of how that is playing out, yesterday the chief scientific adviser to the northern ireland executive, said of all the positive tests in northern ireland that have been recorded, since we have first heard of the coronavirus, 12% of those positive tests have come about in just the last seven days. omicron is spreading he said at an
guilty of criminal offences and he is, of course, also being investigated in new york state, and i believe there is some sort of investigation of his role after election night in georgia, as well but even if, ultimately, he s found guilty of offences, that is not going to bar him from running for the presidency again, is it, just on a point of law? on a point of law, you re correct. if the offences are tax offences, but one of the key offences is aiding and abetting an insurrection, and under the united states federal criminal code, anyone who is found guilty of that offence is ineligible ever again to run for any federal office. all right. now, part of this is, for people like you, it s to sort of influence the political debate as best you can with your legal knowledge. is it helpful, and i put this as politely as i can, that you, from the very beginning of the trump administration, have seemed deeply partisan