true. the president must decide whether or not these individuals can continue to work there. will. it is the president s decision whether to hire somebody. the president made a point of due process. that s called a hiring process. when they knew with this information, they should have never hired this person. less promoted someone who had these allegations of abuse hanging over his head. do you believe john kelly, don mcgahn, are owning up to their role in this? did they do the right thing by allowing this, to continue working there without permanent security clearances? i think they were being very irresponsible at the white
innocent. if trump says he is innocent, he is innocent. when you are dealing with a chief executive like that i am not excusing general kelly at all, it is a recipe for chaos at all times. you are seeing that now. are you seeing that with the speech writer, with porter, you are seeing that. you have a lot of people in this white house who are not the usual characters in the republican and conservative establishment. they didn t want anything to do with it. now you have unvetted, folks trouble getting security clearances. is there a point to the president s point of due process at all? look, this isn t a court. if due process is an issue, it comes up in court. so people who are cop victed have a fair chance to defend themselves. it is different. when someone is coming forward