attorney that hunted you down . how gratifying and validating was that. it was gratifying it was a step forward. you know, we had crossed a bridge that important in terps of solving the case in my mind. i didn t look at it necessarily a point of closure, but it was progress and that s how i viewwed it. how did you stay with some level of faith. this is the kind of experience. not just jonbenet s death but the media circus and accused by the police who are supposed to be the good guys and you did not give up on yourr faith? that s part of what i dealt with in the book to help with issues. beth was killed. i said there is no god. i hit bed rock and i start to grow from there and any time something tragic happens in one s life faith changes.
common sense radar screen. it is getting partisan and irerational. this week the u.n. human rights agreed to hear a complaint about the laws passed in eight states and pending in 32 others. the u.n. rightates commission passing judgment on our voting is bastions of china, cuba and saudi arabia . where a woman can show a photo-id and still not allowed to vote. i suggest a faster and easier way to determine if the u.n. believes it is a violation of human rights to see a photo-id. walk in off of the treat and demand to sit in on the u.n. rights commission meeting without a photo-id? you think that will happen? of course not. disenfranchised is the battle cry. but the point being missed, if
is the stuff true? that s the point and my question here. we can argue why did the new york times give prominence and why did he choose the venue to resign? but is there subitance to what he was saying about goldman who treated their clines with disdane than how it would treat them than the clients. their clients treat goldman with disdain. they are the sophisticated player in the worl. wall street is a sharp-elbowed. they were squeezing fees out of the clients, yes. may not be criminal but was it ethical? as long as you don t lie to people. when you are dealing with smart people. he said they were lying because they were selling what they knew it was good for
enormity of this tragedy there, is the memorial service itself a useful catharsis, a useful point of closure? everything that is sort of imposed on the timeline at this point is artificially imposed. there s no there will be no other event as grave as the one that caused this tragedy in the first place. but has this has this memorial been a real point of community focus, as people are thinking about how to move on to the next stage here? reporter: you know, rachel, closure is an interesting word, and i don t know that i would use it in this context or any other when there has been such a devastating event. but i had a chance to talk to frank keating today, who was the governor in oklahoma city when they had their devastating bombing of the murrah building. and he said something that i ve heard from people here as well, that there is always a chance, at this stage, for when people
shooting. i know you got there on saturday. when you ve been talking with people who live in tucson about what happens next, and about coming to terms with the enormity of this tragedy there, is the memorial service itself a universal catharsis, a useful point of closure? everything that is sort of imposed on the timeline at this point is artificially imposed. there s no there will be no other event as grave as the one that caused this tragedy in the first place. but has this has this memorial been a real point of community focus, as people are thinking about how to move on to the next stage here? reporter: you know, rachel, closure is an interesting word, and i don t know that i would use it in this context or any other when there has been such a devastating event. but i had a chance to talk to frank keating today, who was the governor in oklahoma city when they had their devastating bombing of the murrah building. and he said something that i ve heard from people here as well