ministry publicly released the document they put forward to hamas to your leadership in gaza as well as to the israelis. and it s beak a four-point proposal. very simple. point number one which you will accept is that israel shall cease all hostilities against the gaza strip by land sea and air refrain from conducting ground incursions against gaza or targeting civilians. that s something you definitely want israel to stop launching air strikes into gaza. here s what they want from you, this is the egyptian proposal. i want your specific reaction. all palestinian factions in gaza considerable cease all hostilities i m reading this for our viewers so they know what the egyptian proposal wants hamas to do. all palestinian factions in gaza shall cease all hostilities from the gaza strip against israel via land, sea and underground and commit to refrain from
citizen. first under the treaty, is the american citizen living here or domiciled in malaysia or elsewhere? point number one. even if the passenger were domiciled here in pittsburgh or washington, d.c., the federal courts i think would immediately say, i think, the venue for this whole litigation really is malaysia or maybe china but certainly not a federal court sitting in washington, d.c. and u.s. courts have been pretty juries have been pretty generous in global terms to folks who have lost loved ones. could we expect that the malaysian courts might not be as what is the word generous? i think that s right. there are no courts quite as generous as here in the united states. but getting the litigation to remain in the united states in a fact pattern like you have described involving malaysian airline, i mean, really highly unlikely, no matter how creative
growing, therefore china will never make it is wrong. japan is one-fourth the size of the united states. in order to overtake the u.s. economy, it wouldn t have had to have a per capita income. average four times that of an american. china by contrast is three times the size four times by many measures. all it needs is a per capita gdp one-quarter that of the united states. in other words, the argument is not that china will become an advanced industrial company easily with all the technology that that implies, the argument is china can be about as modern an economy as brazil. but because it has 1.2 billion people, once it does that, it becomes the largest economy in the world. that s true. however, two points. point number one, the chinese are following exactly the same growth model, overinvestment,
and if the perception internationally was that we were not in good faith trying to resolve the issue diplomatically, that, more than anything, would actually begin to fray the edges of the sanctions regime. point number one. point number two, i ve already said this before, you have to compare the approach that we re taking now with the alternatives. the idea that iran, given everything that we know about their history, would just continue to get more and more nervous about more sanctions and military threats and ultimately just say, okay, we give in, i think does not reflect an honest understanding of the iranian
bad retail experience, there are parts of d.c. where you can have about the worst retail experience in america. those places t-pbd to be kind of tend to be local monopoly supermarkets that have heavily unionized work forces. democrats are trying to drive up the cost for competitors. steve: it does seem this does not apply to aoupbized businesses unionized businesses. it applies to businesses that make over $1 billion. it does seem to only apply to wal-mart which would bring quality retail to certain parts of d.c. and people would pay less money. two thoughts. first of all, wal-marts could be exempted from this if they allow collective bargaining at their workplace. point number one. point number two, the cost of living in washington, d.c. is different than the