of course, i think that the president spoke very well, and he was very guarded in the remarks and appropriately so, but a it is a legalt matter, and we have to know the facts, but he said the right thing, it is a tragedy for every american, and sad thing and tragedy for the family. i am glad to see that the candidates are not trying to make political points on the back of trayvon martin. but what is shock iing to mes that i would have thought the same thing, this is a tragedy, and yet it has broken out consistently in the opinion polls along the ideological lines. at some point this has to translate to a change in legislation. this stand your ground law is cowboy country in florida. are you kidding me? first they have the show barely that the other person was not the immediatinge aggressor, so zimmerman is going to say that trayvon martin was the aggressor, and then, okay, did he stand his ground? is there a duty to retreat? now mr. shargle knows and like i know that some states ha
energet energetic, and inspirational story. but marco rubio told us in a presser on april 49, quoth, i wt be the vice president. and like nikki haley said if i am offed any position by governor romney, no, and edwin martinez was no, and you are smart to say i m campaigning for the vice presiden presidency, and say, i want to do my job and do it well. but that is the next day. and also, the person who leads you up to the top of the mountain. and also, chris christie has a great story and the media loves him, but he helped to reach out the blue collar folks that romney needs assistance with that, but those are great names. and sherpa is different than a vp. but the best sherpa right now is ann romney his wife. she is a great speaker, and when we see her. and she has been energized at this point in a way she wasn t two weeks ago and there is some strength there, but i think that
importance is the bail application and that is the risk of flight and whether he will respond to the processes of the court, but the big ticket eitem is that at some point in the future he will make a motion to dismi dismiss the case due on immunity. immunity differs on the defense, because here in new york justification of defense, and just that, defense. in florida, it is a question of the immunity, and his claim will be that he shouldn t be put on trial in the first place. so the judge has the ability to dismiss the case. what is the likelihood of that happening? i don t believe there is any likelihood. i wonder if mr. shargle agrees with me, because if the motion to dismiss is granted, then it is over. whereas in a normal criminal proceedings like in new york, self-defense is a defense, and even if self-defense works, you have to go through the process and you have to go through the trial. i think that there is zero
exploited children, and may i please finish this one key point. sure. we will drive this traffic to the black hat, the underground criminally operated web sites, and ultimately what we will do is to drive this traffic to offshore sources where not only will the web sites and the operators not cooperate, but they are outside of the jurisdiction of u.s. law enforcement, so that law enforcement can t get the information to find these kids and to rescue them and to put together some data to prosecute the pimps and the johns. i have some sympathy with this argument that this is the problem that any one source would prevent the problem, and one would not solve the problem. with that said, we are towards the last words here and let me give you a last statement around this. on this that one point i agree with liz that backpage is
duty to retreat, and some states don t. so these are all mr. zimmerman s subjective point of view. and why is trayvon martin not protected under the stand your ground and this is something most confusing to me. if trayvon is in a place he is allowed to be and walking without any criminal intent, and if he is carrying, and then if he and i don t know whether or not he did, but if he beat up george zimmerman, why isn t that him standing his ground against somebody willing to stand his ground? well, he could have and george zimmerman could have responded in kind, and there has to be a proportionality here, because i can t punch you in the nose and then i take out my gun and shoot you. there has to be proportionality. and on the stand your ground law, there is a carve out, and if zimmerman got out of the truck after he was told by the 911 operator not to follow him, and told that the police will respond.