when i texted her in the morning to check in, i was totally shocked. at that point didn t know what to do, i asked her what i could do to help her, and she said, they were waiting on the national guard, and if we can contact anybody, her phone went dead. we were so upset thinking that we were in imminent danger, that s only we were calling emergency management, deciding what to do. to try to get as much attention, find somebody who lived near them. get there with the boat. when we saw this pictures on social media is this real? i thought it was it was my mom, but i recognized the popcorn machine in the photo for sure.
policy, particularly when motivated by national security concerns are unreviewable even if those actions potentially contravene constitutional rights and protections. there is no president to support this claimed unreviewability which runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy. those are strong words from the court. those are very strong words but there is one precedent, the president for deferring blindly to the executive branch resulted in the internment of thousands upon thousands of japanese americans. at the tail end of world war ii out of a concern that the japanese were about to invade california. looking in hindsight, japan at that point didn t have a navy to invade the united states with so wherever we re seeing this type of radical deference to the executive branch, that s where we re seeing the worst most historically embarrassing tragic examples of executive overreach. deference to the executive
constitutional democracy. those are strong words from the court. those are very strong words but there is one precedent, the president for deferring blindly to the executive branch resulted in the internment of thousands upon thousands of japanese americans. at the tail end of world war ii out of a concern that the japanese were about to invade california. looking in hindsight, japan at that point didn t have a navy to invade the united states with so wherever we re seeing this type of radical deference to the executive branch, that s where we re seeing the worst most historically embarrassing tragic examples of executive overreach. deference to the executive branch is what justifies indiscriminate surveillance, it s what justifies these types of blanket bans on people and remember the executive branch, if they had evidence that any single green card holder, visa holder was engaged in criminal activity, they still retain the right to arrest that person so essentially the trump
profits. a little bit of good news now. the second case involves racial bias in the jury room and whether everything that happens stays there. right? that s the rule for centuries. what happens in the jury room stays there. after the verdict is announced you can t ask one juror to rat out another one. a man convicted of sexually assaulting two teenage girls. after the verdict was announced two of the jurors said one of the jurors said, quote, i think he s guilty because he s a mexican. in his experience it was mexican men get what they want. also the juror said he didn t believe it because the person was an illegal alien though it was a lawful permanent resident. the supreme court was struggling saying if you allow exceptions when it comes to racial bias, what about religion? what about somebody saying she s guilty because she s a woman. where do you draw the line? didn t seem to be a clear answer
never actually engaged. the plane never went to that altitude but kept on setting it at 100 feet. saying i might take this plane to 100 feet. i might crash this plane right now. is there anyway that either the captain who was onboard with him at the time, is there any way that anyone on the ground at the time should have known that this happened or could have known? because of the time, the flight before where he murdered everyone and killed himself, i don t think they could have known from that particular flight. the question i have is airlines regularly go back and look at prior flights. it s a program that they have. they ll pull flight data recorder and look at the information. if someone looking at this guy s past flights, his activity that he engaged in when pilots were leaving the cockpit, that might show notice on behalf of the airline. before this one? the report which is just a preliminary report just basic information does not provide