question. i would say, someone justs reminded me that i am president, and i don t need congress to build the wall, so i think i m just going to start. tucker: [laughs] the crowd would cheer, and msnbc they would say but that is not true, you need congress to build the wall! to which you would say what? pull out your pocket constitution and see who the commander in chief is, who has all of the executive branch power in his hands. he has the department of defense, homeland security, if we were suddenly attacked by china, he would not sit around or north korea hey would not sit around and say well, i would like to respond,a but congress just will not write that bill. he is saying no, i am the commander in chief, i have the power to defend against an invasion. tucker: so he does not need congress to appropriate the funds for the wall, he can just
women who serve on the supreme court or who serve in congress because it is they who have changed the united states constitution, and it is we who need to bring it back. does that make sense? it does. this is a movement to restore the constitution, and what i usually say to people who ask that question, as i say which constitution were you referring to? we have two in america. we have the one that you and i and all your readers and listeners and viewers love and that s the pocket constitution, the one in the national archives and the one changed over the last mostly 115 years by the federal courts and the supreme court by actions of the federal government. i love the original, and my goal is to strip away a bunch of the decisions that change the constitution, that gave the federal government so much power, that made the citizens smaller and restore the citizen and the states to their proper place in the balance. mark: is it realistic to believe that the entities, the institutions and
women who serve on the supreme court or who serve in congress because it is they who have changed the united states constitution, and it is we who need to bring it back. does that make sense? it does. this is a movement to restore the constitution, and what i usually say to people who ask that question, as i say which constitution were you referring to? we have two in america. we have the one that you and i and all your readers and listeners and viewers love and that s the pocket constitution, the one in the national archives and the one changed over the last mostly 115 years by the federal courts and the supreme court by actions of the federal government. i love the original, and my goal is to strip away a bunch of the decisions that change the constitution, that gave the federal government so much power, that made the citizens smaller and restore the citizen and the states to their proper place in the balance. mark: is it realistic to believe that the entities, the institutions and
okay, that s interesting again. that s already in the constitution. i can t remember the exact phrase. it s given to the federal government and reserved to the states and people. that has been ignored. education is a great example. yeah, you are hitting on the key point when most of us think about the contusion like the pocket constitution. the original and national archives. i have a copy on my desk. 2,738 pages. this is every supreme court case to tell us what the constitution means. i know you read it. it s a fairly simple document. it will take several hundred pages. the realty is what they have done is dramatically expand the
the epa and things like that. okay, that s interesting again. that s already in the constitution. i can t remember the exact phrase. it s given to the federal government and reserved to the states and people. that has been ignored. education is a great example. yeah, you are hitting on the key point when most of us think about the contusion like the pocket constitution. the original and national archives. i have a copy on my desk. 2,738 pages. this is every supreme court case to tell us what the constitution means. i know you read it. it s a fairly simple document. it will take several hundred pages. the realty is what they have