lies where this that pnapolitan guy is trying to tell him what happened to him is unconstitutional use of intelligence apparatus against him. that s right. it s a package of lies, but, lawrence, we have to remember that the white house helped package this in the first place. it was the white house that laundered intelligence to devin nunes in the spring that brought unmasking and introduced the american people to the here to fore unknown term to most people. it was the white house that created this. it was the white house that packaged this. in order to distract from the russia investigation. this is a white house that has one tactic, whether it s distracting from the president s blatantly racist remarks in the oval office today, for example, or distracting from the russia investigation, a perennial favorite. what they did was to create a distraction saying don t look over here, look behind you. look over there. there s a thing called
so let s get to judge napolitan judge napolitano. i promise that we will get to taxes as well. this is a huge day. get in here. we need you to tell us what is going on. what do you make of the latest with this? well, i think this is probably in the tip of the iceberg it, so to speak. it is a nightmare for donald trump. because michael flynn was his constant companion on national security matters. so, from february of 2017, the downside for the government is that whatever testimony general flynn provides is coming out of the mouth of someone the government itself has acknowledged is not worthy. he hasn t pleaded guilty of lying to the fbi. the downside for the president is, this keeps the russian thing, the russian story front and center at a time when the
this extreme vetting executive order is. a little bit of i would say, less than thorough explanation of where they were going with this. the president weighing in see you in court. chris: thank you. bring us up-to-date on any more information you get. let me bring in judge napolitan judge napolitano. fox news chief judicial analyst. talk about the issue of the court trying to sort out. this is the court, not the president, saying we are not persuaded by the president s argument that this is a national security issue of so much urgency that you need to take this step. it is precisely the wrong thing for the court to do. when you have the following observations. the constitution assigns the decision-making for foreign policy exclusively to the