That a businessman would have knowledge is limited in any when he is about to sign a transaction. But if you go after his integrity, right, if you go check. And by that he clearly meant after his public service, if you go after his military record, that President Trump was youre done. Thinking about or had in front but chuck, isnt there a high stakes problem with that, for of him the possibility of providing Security Assistance to trump and the republicans to say, because then the next question is, okay, who does know ukraine. It was similar to writing a check to someone who youre what trump said . Bolton and trump. About to send. He used that analogy very and they dont want those folks to come before congress. I absolutely agree. Im saying if there is a path to clearly to indicate that this try and point out that he has limited knowledge, thats the would be this would require path and its a narrow one. Something. If that person owed him does it ultimately work . No, it doesnt. Right.
that chaos in moscow he caused was not over. he led the most brazen affront to putin s rule in his 23 years at the helm. taking an armed rebellion, marching on moscow and turning around. the apparent reason, a deal brokered by belarus president plushenko. putin saved with a neighboring ruling he usually treated with contempt. the deal was opaque, with wagner moving to belarus. and then, prigozhin appeared, surviving a long time for a putin challenger, popping up in africa this week, saying he would expand russia s influence there. it would be another turn in his remarkable and sordid career. initially putin s chef, he became a military contractor supplying food. expanded into influence
i think the united states can do business with this man. what i have seen of him so far indicates that he s capable of being a very strong, effective and forceful leader. president bush thought he was trustworthy and you won t be the last. i was able to see inside his soul. and despite those saying that putin could not be trusted, ushenko survived the poisoning. despite the radiation death of putin critic ufamenko.
roman and his girlfriend. he told fellow passengers, i m facing the death penalty. while living in exile he was deemed a terrorist, a spin on the soviet designation of the opposition as enemies of the people. his real crime was editing a blog during a mass protest that began last summer. here s a refresh. in august, there was a sham election in the former soviet republic where lushenko has ruled for 27 years. after jailing two opposition candidates, the man known as europe s last dictator allegedly won 80% of the vote. a result, not surprisingly, deemed free or fair by international observers. this provoked mass protests for months in the face of brutal beatings and mass rests. lushenko was congratulated by his fellow autocrats but most western nations condemned it. there was no condemnation of the crackdown. no support for the dissidents from then-president trump. then secretary of state pompeo put out a perfunctory statement