states to do whatever they this want, with the electors in some cases no matter what happened in the election. states get to choose their electors. in bush v. gore, the conservatives who normally take the position that states rights are important and states authority must not be overridden by the federal government, those conservatives switched and they ended up saying no, in this particular case, we the supreme court, we the federal government, have authority that trumps the state. and to a lot of people it looked like justices like justice scalia were completely reversing their long-held jurisprudenceal view to achieve a political outcome they wanted, the election of george w. bush. didn t that damage the court s legitimacy more than anything i can imagine? i can imagine worse things. what about plessy and ferguson?
Presenting: Civics 101 Trivia
nhpr.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nhpr.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
this dining room would be full. people are going to paris which is right across, where they don t have to worry about it. in new orleans parish on an island having to carry the burden for the whole state. and in that regard i think it is wrong. it is killing us. the owner of plessy s even, the vaccine mandate impacted his business. we will lose a significant piece of business. the customers were divided. it is an added burden on business owners. i feel comfortable knowing there are things in place for our safety. the slowest week we have ever seen in the last 6 months. reporter: she owns an art gallery in the french quarter it
perhaps you will get a witness to testify because of that. but it is putting a lot of chips in an uncertain pile, right? i don t gamble so that s not the right but it is a curious close enough. it is a curious strategy because you are right. it s unclear how this puts any pressure on moderate republicans at all. it is also not clear to me that nancy pelosi thinks she has leverage. right? i have read the stories on this and seen her comment on it. it seems like some of the stories have been a little overwritten. seems like she wants to wait on the process, see who the managers are, and then there has to be a bill who the managers are, how to pay for this. it seems perfectly reasonable to wait until january to do it. i don t think she senses she has any leverage with mitch mcconnell. she has met mitch mcconnell, right. yeah. yeah. the idea she knows what would the leverage be? i have this thing over here that
is weighing four staunch allies for the house to be the house managers. jim jordan, john ratcliffe, mike johnson and mark meadows. everyone except meadows met with the white house counsel this week. what do you make of those picks? standards. as you would expect. these were people that were sort of stars or performed or good at making the case for the president when it was this the house. one interesting thing plessy did is she drew a line in the sand. she said i am not sending this over until i believe it is fair. so by definition, whenever she sends it over, she is saying it is fair. if she sent it over tomorrow, apparently she undercut chuck schumer s whole case because she is saying it is fair that it went there. she has to extract something from mitch in order for it to be fair in her opinion. i don t think mcconnell is
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.