blasey ford or deborah ramirez. this is about a smear. diane a smear. dianne feinstein and the rest of the democrats trying to get us back. they won t say this. but for merrick garland. i will say, i think it s a little disingenuous of mitch mcconnell to go on the senate floor and condemn this process when merrick garland there were 238 days between the day merrick garland was nominated in the 2016 election, almost eight months. they never held any hearings. the fact is, they both play politics here. and these i think to lump these accusations into just politics, it unnecessarily and i think wrongly lessens them. and that we should hear. and he said he wants to tell a story. right. he s going to tell a story. that s appropriate. and very clear that republicans are going on offense, and they want to move forward with this as swiftly as possible. they want to put this behind them. they don t want to prolong this process with the potential that there are other allegati
charges of corruption against two gop house members. the president tweeted, to very popular republican congressmen were brought to a well-publicized charge, just ahead of the midterms but the jeff sessions justice department, two easy wins now in doubt because there s not enough time. good job, jeff. the president is saying play politics. protect members of congress, even if they ve committed acts of corruption before the election. i don t think that s what the president was sang at all. the department of justice has long-standing guidelines through successive administrations that says whenever possible, the justice department should avoid taking actions that may impact an election. the president was referring to that. chris: these are two people, one supposedly committing insider trading and another one
charges of corruption against two gop house members. the president tweeted, to very popular republican congressmen were brought to a well-publicized charge, just ahead of the midterms but the jeff sessions justice department, two easy wins now in doubt because there s not enough time. good job, jeff. the president is saying play politics. protect members of congress, even if they ve committed acts of corruption before the election. i don t think that s what the president was sang at all. the department of justice has long-standing guidelines through successive administrations that says whenever possible, the justice department should avoid taking actions that may impact an election. the president was referring to that. chris: these are two people, one supposedly committing insider trading and another one
charges of corruption against two gop house members. the president tweeted, to very popular republican congressmen were brought to a well-publicized charge, just ahead of the midterms but the jeff sessions justice department, two easy wins now in doubt because there s not enough time. good job, jeff. the president is saying play politics. protect members of congress, even if they ve committed acts of corruption before the election. i don t think that s what the president was sang at all. the department of justice has long-standing guidelines through successive administrations that says whenever possible, the justice department should avoid taking actions that may impact an election. the president was referring to that. chris: these are two people, one supposedly committing insider trading and another one
i really worry and this ukraine story is a perfect example of foreign governments increasingly playing politics increasingly putting information into american information streams or withholding it as seems to be the case here with ukraine to kind of play politics with the trump administration that is under fire, that is very aggressive and granting withholding its special favors. i think david s absolutely right. but let s remember about two years ago, a little bit less, at the rnc where you and i think both were, do you remember when paul manafort had the republican platform changed to say that ukraine would not get lethal arms. and then they back off, i don t know what, like a year and a half later they back off investigating manafort and what did they get? they get lethal arms. probably a coincidence. it s a remarkable 180. that was the issue. specifically this relatively