could rescind his visa. they have opportunity to recancel the visa and restart the proceedings anew. the ruling was on fairly small technical grounds and procedural grounds on what happened when he was being retained. he wasn t given proper time to consult with people, proper access to his phone, documents, things like that. i think the australian authorities could say, hey, that was not right the first time, let s recancel it and do it all over and we ll get you this time. they re not letting it go just yet. it has to be said, australia has been particularly tough when it s come to sticking to the rules and requiring covid vaccinations to all play ers an djokovic was told he would need to be vaccinated. so what message does this court decision send? it s pretty anttithetical