trying to do rulemaking, which is somehow under regulations they re trying to expandseg the definition of what a firearm is to include some gun s partsom that can then be used later to make your own perfectly legal firearm. so the other problem is anyone with the technical skills required to build a firearm is. not committing violent crimes with guns only do that . a so they re basically targetingat a segment of the population that is non violentio. exactly e right. the second point is even if they could do it, which i don t believe they can, it s going to have no reduction on crime. so even the federal government s own studies have shown that the vast majority of crime guns are stolen. they re not built att home. they re not through retail gun shops. they re stolen from law abidingr citizens. this is going to have zero effect on crime. so i have to ask myself if they don t have the authority to do it in the constitution, they don t have the procedural rulemaking m authority to do itn