Comment is closed. We have one recommendation from our budget analyst. So motion to approve the budget analysts recommendation and since this is a policy matter i agree with the policy, i think it makes a lot of sense that we are consolidating our permitting functions and also creating, consolidating our offices of the city and it makes sense costwise as well, so i appreciate all the work thats been done putting this together and ill motion to approve the budget analysts recommendation and the underlying ordinance. As amended. We can take that without objection. Madam clerk, why dont we call items 1 through 3 and see if supervisor wiener and his office will get here. Item 1, resolution the inaudible city for initial term of 10 years and authorizing the planning director to execute the historical property contract. Item 2, resolution approving the Historic Property contract between the owners of 563 to 567 wallase street and the city for an initial term of 10 years and authorizing the p
Examined and items 34 through 36 reverse the items. Both sides have agreed to continue until our december 9th meeting to board of supervisors. Supervisor farrell is proposing a motion to continue this to the go ethnic of december is there a second second by supervisor kim any Public Comment on this item . Anyone who wants to comment on the substantive meter seeing none, Public Comment is closed and on the motion to continue colleagues well take that without objection. Those items are continued until the ninth of december items 37 through 40 for interested parties for the Planning Department determination that the proposed project it categorically exempt if the california quality act and the motions to reverse the determination and the preparation of finding. So the appeal has been withdrawn out of the need to follow process let me open up the hearing for seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And could i have a motion to affirm the determination. Motion that i supervisor avalos and sec
I what sitting next to a black gentleman and we had a nice conversation. Turns out hes a longterm engineer and architect for the city. And he was telling me a lot of really cool things that hes done and the projects hes been involved in and the city is a beautiful place. Oh, and before i forget id like to invite everybody here november 27th, i think thats thattion, to alcatraz for a sunrise sail. People line up at 4 oclock in the morning. Usually people arent doing a whole lot at 4 oclock in the morning so come on down. This gentleman told me a rot of wonderful things. I thought it was great they had such architects and concerns. But i dont understand why they would not be an Environmental Review. What would be the reason as to why not . And im listening to these people complaining here and talking and im reminded of an old statement those who seek to save their lives, and i think that includes their comfort zones shall lose them. This is the third meeting ive been to today. I saw 300
In the state and i get is an opportunity to go to yosemite and relax im going to come back but be on is a basic right now ive known friends of mine it helped me to graduate like master horton and david and master Jonathan Burke for continually pressing me in order to pursue that i want to thank my landlord for giving me the opportunity to do so as well, there or so many wonderful things in the city im going to take a break from but i promise you ill be back thank you very much. clapping. thank you want and members of the board its a pleasure. Thank you and with that, colleagues it is 3 00 p. M. We have 43 p. M. Special offenders id like to take the second, third and fourth special orders until we go to the one that will be substantive madam clerk call the Second Special order of 33 through 311 come prices the individuals in the Planning Department determination that the proposed project located at 2853 on broadway street a examined and items 34 through 36 reverse the items. Both sides
Appellant and two minutes for public followed by a presentation from the Planning Commission up to 10 minutes followed by a presentation by the project sponsor or the representative and followed by members of the public that wish to speak in opposition 2 minutes per speaker and final up to 3 minutes for the appellant with that, unless theres questions supervisor mar opening comments. Thank you president chiu and colleagues about this time last year, i was approached by this project moving forward in january and residents met with me i met with different project sponsors as well this is has been a long time in the works ill say that there are supporters of project and opponent so we have people from the neighborhood on both sides i do feel very strongly that we need to look at this issue within a board complexity of the stock of are we talking about controlled housing within our city and losing rental control units over one thousand per year were noted building that many it is rapidly s