precollusive none of the facts will really apply to smartmatic. they re willing to settle the case keep in mind, the reason we know about $700 million in settlement believe me that was a point that was negotiated and i bet it actually cost money. in other words, the plaintiffs said we want to publicize this frankly if i m the plaintiffs lawyers, i don t care about the admissibility i care about the money. it speaks volumes fox lawyers didn t talk to reporters yesterday but the network put out a statement. we acknowledged the court s ruling finding certain claims about dominion to be false this settlement reflects fox s continued commitment to the highest go back to that ambiguity
noose is beginning to tighten. i think the girlfriend is the key part of the daisy change, she was the head of alameda refunds, they got the funds meaning the customer funds, if she flips and hasn t been charged yet, i think it s game, set and match for ftx. aishah: what about the celebrities we see the pictures up. the celebrity spokes people sued by invests because they were a part of pitching this idea that obviously fell apart very, very quickly. people like tom brady, steph curry there, shaquille o neal and i ve got to tell you, shaq made this comment like, look, i don t understand this. i was just a paid spokesperson for a commercial. and you ve got to think of all the other americans watching this, thinking, you know, i don t understand how crypto works either, so, maybe shaq s right. maybe he didn t know what he was doing. could these people get in trouble? no, they can t. i think the plaintiffs lawyers who decided to sue them
manufacturers from being targeted by plaintiffs lawyers to try to destroy the industry . they reug going to they re going to at least put throughgh the committee and put through the house a repeal of that bill as well. they mean they mean what they intend to do. they have no respect for the second amendment right to keep and bear arms. congressman, we are actually hearing that the the legislation has moved through the judiciary committee. so thatic just broke. ut so republicans, you gots your work cut out for you across this country. make your voices heard and the senate s going to have to stop this. but congressman scary for allnt of us who believe in the second amendment. thank you for doing your part to stand up foroi i. t but that legislation is moving through cnn, ra their grasp of european politics. well, we re going to show po you next why it s very odd and weighty. my pun
word just want word, you didn t use the word criminal proceedings. there is no criminal word criminal proceedings. there is no criminal proceeding. you word criminal proceedings. there is no criminal proceeding. no criminal proceeding. you are uuite no criminal proceeding. you are quite right- no criminal proceeding. you are quite right. accusations. - no criminal proceeding. you are quite right. accusations. civil. l quite right. accusations. civil. civil. quite right. accusations. civil. civil- the quite right. accusations. civil. civil. the interesting - quite right. accusations. civil. civil. the interesting point - quite right. accusations. civil. i civil. the interesting point which is going civil. the interesting point which is going to civil. the interesting point which is going to have to do is see does have is going to have to do is see does have to go is going to have to do is see does have to go on zoom or he could go to america have to go on zoom or he co
resurgence of white supremacists violence. so this case is one of the most expensive uses of the kkk, it acts as an 1871 law in modern day, and they are trying to, the lawyers, the plaintiffs lawyers, are trying to soothe the white supremacist out of the existence. so that is what s going on. so, under this 1871 clan act, which again was created in response to the sort of white supremacist terrorists who have risen in the wake of the reconstruction in the south that we re using violent means and intimidation to stop black goats from voting, stop black votes from reassembly, this creates civil liability for people that engage in the white supremacist activities designed to restrict peoples civil rights. the theory of the case here, is these people up a night rally did this. and they are now civilly liable.