this industry has exploded in the past decade and their connections with journalists have exploded along with it. tucker: if you are reporting out of story one of your concerns is being used by people feeding you the information for some purpose that you re not aware of. it seems like this arrangement is particularly vulnerable to that. it should be your first and foremost concern against a journalist. at the time, i spent most of my career with the health and safety report. we broke the story about oxycontin and its illegal marketing and when drug companies were making claims, the reporter would scrutinize them. unfortunately in the case of the dossier end of their situations we have reporters who are into giving these claims the same level of scrutiny and as a result this thing kind of metastasize on its own.
you know, i m not 100% sure, senator, but i think it s probably a little more than half, probably around 62%. i can t tell you the exact number, but it s probably in the same range. some people vaccinated at our facility and others outside of the facility. we are encouraging our employees to get vaccinated. we ve been doing town hall and education seminars. as you understand, the federal government is not requiring it. so we do not know. she doesn t know here are those in charge of propagating and dispersing the vaccine can t even get their own people to buy in. and tucker, you of course will address all of this on your tucker carlson tonight special tomorrow night on the left s war on science. tucker: trace gallagher, thank you so much. it s kind of an amazing story.
tucker: yeah, buzzfeed just printed it without vetting any of it. why do you think that is? what has changed, that intel services private or government can just feed information and see it in print? you know, i think it s a result of several factors. there has been a tremendous growth within the media. there has been a fracturing of it. there are extremes on either end politically of the media arc. and so, there is a great appetite for spoofs. everyone wants to claim that something is new. we have some intelligence. we have something fresh that no one else has. and as a result, this becomes a petri dish for these private intelligence firms to feed information. tucker: the reporting that you are doing on this, we should have been reading about for the past year. this seems really important and i hope that we talk again. barry meyer come appreciate it
they assign a score, and based on that score will delete the comment depending upon the content within it. tucker: according to those documents here s one example of what facebook considers a tier one vaccine hesitancy comments. if the vaccines are so useful then why do we need to still wear a mask and social distance afterward? fair question but not aloud. he s been suspended from his job at facebook and morgan joins us now. thanks for coming on and for your bravery. it sounds like any real questions at all about the vaccines are not allowed by facebook. tucker, that s true. anything that questions a vaccine on their narrative regarding the vaccine which is, everyone should get the vaccine, the vaccine is good and one, you won t have any bad side effects,
messing up at this point, why do you want to be with such an emasculated loser and be betrothed to him for the rest of your life? i would lose my mind if i was this woman. having said that i am about about to go out to dinner with my own wife, maybe i should put a mask on. it has moved beyond of the theater of the absurd to just the level of mindlessness, the party of science is now embracing fundamentally antiscience beliefs with no legitimate basis in reality. it s mindless insanity. tucker: i wonder though, once you ve admitted that you wear a mask, a surgical mask, a soiled surgical mask in intimate moments with your wife, there s no going back. you basically just told the