we are asking the recording industry to voluntarily assist parents who are concerned by placing a warning label on music products inappropriate for younger children due to explicit sexual or violent lyrics. in the 80s these artists who were pushing boundaries in different ways were bringing those messages and images into our homes. and that provided a political opportunity to push back against it. we can say they re senators wives, ooh, and they re messing around in washington. but they obviously have some real concerns. there s a lot that they do that i applaud because they are taking responsibility as citizens. i brought along two videos which i believe are representative of the kind of presentation that have caused the furor. got it bad, got it bad, got it bad i m hot for teacher i ve got it bad, so bad
got it bad, got it bad, got it bad i m hot for teacher i ve got it bad, so bad who s going to decide what s a sexual content of a lyric? who s going to decide what is obscene? same housewives who are spearheading the movement? in all candor, i would tell you it s outrageous filth and that if i could find some way constitutionally to do away with it i would. fans felt i m capable of making my own decisions about the music i want to listen to. i don t need tipper gore deciding that this is too obscene for me. the next witness will be mr. frank zappa. the establishment of a rating system voluntary or otherwise opens the door to an endless parade of moral quality control programs based on things certain christians don t like. i think you should leave it up to the parent because not all parents want to keep their
products inappropriate for younger children due to explicit sexual or violent lyrics. in the 80s these artists who were pushing boundaries in different ways were bringing those messages and images into our homes. and that provided a political opportunity to push back against it. we can say they re senators wives, ooh, and they re messing around in washington. but they obviously have some real concerns. there s a lot that they do that i applaud because they are taking responsibility as citizens. i brought along two videos which i believe are representative of the kind of presentation that have caused the furor. got it bad, got it bad, got it bad i m hot for teacher i ve got it bad, so bad who s going to decide what s a sexual content of a lyric? who s going to decide what is
facebook. we ve had lots of allegations about facebook. we ve seen reporting before and internal data before. how different is this? how consequential could this whistle-blower be for facebook? . hey, katty, i think the question is it bad, is it very bad, or is it terrible? i think those are the choices we re looking at at the moment. i think the think is frances puts a human face on this story. she s a facebook employee who s really been at the belly of the beast who s come forward. she s basically come forward and says facebook has no integrity. there was a stunning quote she used when she said, facebook needs to declare itself morally bankrupt. so these are very powerful words. and it really couldn t come at a
our homes. and that provided a political opportunity to push back against it. we can say they re senators wives, ooh, and they re messing around in washington. but they obviously have some real concerns. there s a lot that they do that i applaud because they are taking responsibility as citizens. i brought along two videos which i believe are representative of the kind of presentation that have caused the furor. got it bad, got it bad, got it bad i m hot for teacher i ve got it bad, so bad who s going to decide what s a sexual content of a lyric? who s going to decide what is obscene? same housewives who are spearheading the movement? in all candor, i would tell you it s outrageous filth and that if i could find some way constitutionally to do away with