evidence at court, that many of the statements denied that they were ever traffic for ready trial. none of them had ever been trafficked. during the investigation mr ramzan was arrested. he had never really met the defendant, had nothing to do with trafficking, had never been alone in a room with errors let alone in a room with errors let alone had sex with her. he described in court is utter consternation at being publicly arrested on the promenades and questioned by the police. i will set out more of the impact of this offending upon him and his family later in his remarks. the defendant set about seeking to back up allegations against mr ramzan and the fictitious traffickers. she did so in a number of ways. i will summarise here only some of them. she manipulated people with whom she was in contact via snapchat to contact her. she would rename these people in her phone with the names of supposed traffickers. she would induce sexual messages from them and take screenshots o
on wednesday the 17th ofjuly and a man called salsa, and invented traffic came to her door and slapped her in the pin pinter to the wall, and told her to follow orders she would get on snapchat. he said that she needed to earn them £10,000 as a result. she said that she was then told to go to leeds. there she was taken to a house where she had sex with two men. she and a girl called molly then walked to another premises. there were other girls there. there she said she had sex with three men. she was then driven to a chicken shop in headingley where she had sex with another man. she then said she had driven to bramley and then bradford where she had sex with three men. she then saw her passport on the table with a ring on it and flight details to bangladesh, so she ran. when the