of the nhs who seem to incur the worse and most vicious pile ons. and the nature of the abuse is different too, you willjust be told to bleep off if you re a male doctor. but if you re a female doctor, it ll be much more personal and visceral and it will target you as a woman. so who is abusing women online? thirty people, mainly men, regularly send me horrible messages. at first glance, some of their profiles look pretty normal. that suggests they are a health care assistant. they re actually a big spurs fan and i m also a spurs fan. so it looks like he lives in great yarmouth.
of the nhs who seem to incur the worse and most vicious pile ons. and the nature of the abuse is different too, you willjust be told to bleep off if you re a male doctor. but if you re a female doctor, it ll be much more personal and visceral and it will target you as a woman. so who is abusing women online? thirty people, mainly men, regularly send me horrible messages. at first glance, some of their profiles look pretty normal. that suggests they are a health care assistant. they re actually a big spurs fan and i m also a spurs fan. so it looks like he lives in great yarmouth. i make them angry because as part of myjob, i challenge
the past that might have been seen as revolutionary 30 years ago that are no longer that in this current climate? a lot has changed in 30 years. when i started writing the column in the very early 90s, you know, i wrote columns about gay marriage that even a lot of gay people were uncomfortable with, advocating for gay marriage. that certainly changed. you know, when you write about the topic i do and you write publicly, you get criticism. and advice columns always welcome that criticism. like my inspiration, ann landers, i always printed letters from people who were arguing with me and disagreeing with me and telling me i was wrong about the particulars of the situation or about an issue or a topic. and i ve always had to sort of think and reassess and take in. it can be a problem now with internet pile-ons and twitter, if you re a writer and you have
allen. mike, axios is looking at the massachusetts democrat s unexpected advantage in the 2020 presidential primary field. you talk about how she gets a ton of coverage, not much criticism. clearly that has reached the president. he s not happy about it. that s right. what s her advantage there? well, good morning. it shows what elizabeth warren has pulled off what every politician dreams of. online she s talked about a lot, but not the victim of sustained criticism or media pile ons. if you look at over the last four months, the stories that have gotten the most interactions online, sort of retweets and shares, likes, comments the most positive ones are by far going to elizabeth warren. what s unique about her coverage, all those policy proposals are a little bit of a shield for her. instead of being ripped people writing about like side
directed cohen to lie to congress. cohen said mr. trump did not tell me to lie to congress but also said this. in his way, he was telling me to lie. he speaks in a code, and i understand the code, because i ve been around him for a decade. so was buzzfeed vindicated? i don t think buzzfeed was vi vindicated, no. i don t enjoy the pile-ons and didn t enjoy the one that took place around buzzfeed. i think there was a story there, but i think we already knew part of it, frankly, from cohen s own presentencing memo, which referenced cohen testifying in accordance in directives of the president. i think they wrote a story that went further than what they knew. and i think that when we do that, then we have to deal with the fallout. and so i don t i don t think this was a ball-spiking moment. i think that i understand if i were the reporters, i would probably argue that it was. yeah, that s what they re arguing. right. but i think it s an argument