congress. and i think they also then continue, because the constitution is neutral, that this court should be scrupulously neutral on the question of abortion, neither pro-choice nor pro-life but because they say the constitution doesn t give us the authority, we should leave it to the states and we should be scrupulously neutral on the question. and that they are saying here, i think, that we should return to a position of neutrality on that contentious social issue rather than continuing to pick sides on that issue. so i think that s, at a big picture level, their argument. i want to give you a chance to respond to that. yes, a few points if i may, your honor. first, of course those very same argument were made in casey and the court rejected them saying that philosophical disagreements can t be resolved in a way that a woman has no choice in the
declare a state of emergency over staffing at the fire department. joining me john cranley, also a democratic candidate for ohio governor. mr. mayor, good to see you. i don t know if misery loves company, seeing a lot of the same things that other cities, and as of yesterday, 26 of your city s firefighters had to quarantine. how is it looking this morning and how thinly staffed is the fire department right now? well, i think we re going to be okay. that s part of why i declared an emergency, to give our fire chief the authority that he needs to do some unpopular things, like cancel vacations and extend mandatory overtime, because we ve got to put the citizens safety first through this new year s eve weekend. at a bigger picture level it s because of covid. this would be a normal time some people get vacation, some don t. because of so many on covid and on top of it, a number of people that have to quarantine if they had exposure to somebody with covid, it s incredibly
and history, that the constitution s neither pro-life nor pro-choice. on the question of abortion, we and they would say, therefore, it should be left to the people, to the states or the congress. and i think they also then continue, because the constitution is neutral, that this court should be scrupulously neutral on the question of abortion, neither pro-choice nor for life. but, because they say that the constitution doesn t give us the authority, we should leave it to the states and we should be scrupulously neutral on the question. and that they are seeing here, i think, that we should return to a position of neutrality on that contentious social issue rather than continuing to pick sides on that issue. so i think that s, at a big picture level, their argument. i want to give you a chance to respond to that.
disseminate to their clients. yeah. you are jumping right deep into it. i m saying at a big picture level, how often do u.s. defense attorneys in a case get accused by a federal prosecutor of a disinformation campaign online? i mean, even that, just that? right. almost never. discovery disputes come up pretty regularly in criminal cases. something in this magnitude, nothing you see in the average case. broader than the legal fight, what do you think mueller is trying to say or put on notice here? i think he is putting a real danger to give out information that may have you know information about uncharged people in this investigation. that may have information about the sources about the investigation the tactics and the methods that we re using. it s a real danger not just because it could be leaked in the united states, because it is being leaked in russia. and they are using this fgs, t
need to own up to on a big picture level, which is one party has consistently tried to pass laws, do things to get people not to vote and another part is he s consistently tried to encourage people voting. this is going to hang around republicans necks if we have massive problems again this year with people being, you know, denied at the polls, not being counted. this is just, it s one election too many. you can t keep doing that. listen, i don t want to get too far here but this is what cnn obtained, a series of e-mails and said led to the level of this accusation of hacking. the e-mails included in exchange between the georgia democratic party operatives refer to findings by a voter who said he discovered potential vulnerabilities in the states voter information page and it s