you re looking live at nashville, tennessee where three children and three staff members have been killed following a shooting at the covenant school. the female shooter described as a 28-year-old nashville resident and a former student at the school itself. also dead after being shot by police. she was reportedly wielding two assault-style rifles and a pistol. the shooting taking place a little after 10:00 a.m. this morning in a second floor lobby area after the suspect made her way in to the building apparently through a side entrance. the white house reacting quickly saying enough is enough and calling on congress to end the epidemic of school violence. welcome. i m neil cavuto. there s so much we don t know and dots they re still trying to put together to trace what happened this morning and why, why this 28-year-old former student at that very school would do what she did. let s get the very latest from jonathan serrie following it from the very beginning. jonathan? hi
volunteering information so we can understand what in the world happened down in that white house. so why do you think, nick, he s not? the idea he could have such access and give firsthand accounts of trump s efforts to seize the power of the doj as we heard from one hearing to corrupt it. the idea of the scheme to try to oust the acting attorney general but i suspect to the extent that cipollone is trying to carve out certain areas he doesn t have to talk about, i m assuming privilege will be a part of this and obviously, he can bend the ear of the president. will that be enough you think to overcome the obligation john is speaking about and is it valid? not at all. i mean, look, there is no attorney client privilege for starters. the white house counsel does not represent the president of the united states personally. he s not his personal lawyer. so there is no personal attorney client privilege. the only question is whether or not there is any valid executive privile
revealed to the country yesterday, to witnesses that were to appear before your committee for depositions. do you believe they constitute witness tampering? yes, i do. i think that s something that should be looked at by our committee and potentially by the department of justice. i don t think it s lost on anyone that, you know, the former president, you know, has behavior like we heard yesterday. but specific to our witnesses, we take incredibly seriously the safety and security of those individuals who have testified before us, and like the vice chair said, we asked witnesses routinely whether they have had outreach from other members of the former administration. you say you do believe it constitutes witness tampering. has it been referred to the department of justice? i m not going to talk about the investigative steps that we have taken. but what i will say is i think that those statements speak for themselves. the words that vice chair cheney put up on the screen