it s possible if an indictment is brought. but it s no longer justice department policy to name unindicted coconspirator as a general rule. but i think the interesting question is there s a certain category of cases that the justice department investigators which it s clear for there to be any political involvement whatsoever. a bank robbery case, insider trading case. but a case where the justice department is involving bringing national security, implications for foreign relations with other countries, cases in which there would be implications for intelligence gathering and sources and the intelligence community will have real interest in what comes out and how it s presented. ordinarily the justice department might consult with the state department, the cia, other organizations in government and ultimately maybe
trump s fall campaign. there were 66 days in the fall campaign, he talked about them 146 times, more than he talked about infrastructure. these were core trump campaign weapons built in russia, deployed in the united states. they hurt the clinton campaign, a lot of them were released the day the access hollywood came out, as an effort to distract from that. so if the mueller investigation is a witch hunt, getting the people with the e-mails is capturing the broomstick. we are getting close to the heart of the matter. i think i learned the phrase unindicted coconspirator in the watergate investigation. richard nixon was listed as that, which is a person that you don t feel you can indict for one reason or another. is it possible we could see vladimir putin s name as an unindicted coconspirator.