you are attributing the confirmation to the affiliate and not to you at msnbc news. they have photos? does iphoto match the photo of the person that is a suspect? person of interest? i m hoping we can get this soon. there is a photo we have of someone sitting on the ground. it is hard to see the exact level of detail that we might need. the suspect with his back towards the camera. we are putting this on our affiliate. it is hard for everyone to follow these levels. we feel comfortable that telling you the affiliate and the shooter is in custody based on this photo evidence they have put on their website.
decided to question chuck. we took him down to the sheriff s office. the sheriff s office confronted with the photo evidence, chuck s story changed dramatically. his first statement to the police had been that he arrived at the house after bob died and called 9-1-1. now, he said, when he arrived, bob wasn t quite dead. but was taking his last gasps. he had come home, found mr. mcclancy said he was still alive. he was barely breathing. chuck said he was the one who staged the scene and took the photos because he didn t know bob was going to die. and hoped that photos of his friends suffering could leverage better benefits from the va. did you think that he could ve killed his friend bob? i thought was possible. at the time, detective jones believe that he had at least a case of negligence. the negligence cause death, that was the evidence we had at the time. if he had moved quicker or
we don t know if somebody copied that document and as former counter intelligence peter strzok said during these 150 social events at mar-a-lago there s plenty of photo evidence that the door to the basement area was frequently open and unattended during those events. how do you begin as a former national security official begin to assess the damage that this document had been floating around for months without anyone knowing where it was? it s exceptionally difficult task and possibly impossible one because there are so many documents involved and so many sensitive programs that rely on so many sensitive technical collection systems and human sources abroad and if that information has been exposed and has been compromised we don t know the extent of the damage because there s no way to determine exactly who might have access to that information and what information donald trump
days after the insurrection. a meeting that was said to have happened in moscow. speaking to reporters, putin claims he told the commanders at the meeting that they could continue to fight but under a different leader. he then claims that the men were nodding in agreement, all of these wagner troops, they were totally in agreement, but prigozhin who was sitting in the front row. he spoke up and said, no, the guys do not agree with this decision. that s what we re seeing here in the exchange with the reporter. keep in mind, we do not have photo evidence or corroboration that the meeting took place, who was there. this is what the kremlin is telling us. keep in mind, vladimir putin is saying the generals nodded and fighting for him, but highlights prigozhin saying the guys do not agree with the decision. that s the context around which we have not seen prigozhin since. president biden says the u.s. has no idea what putin has done with prigozhin. he spoke today. determining what happene