record. for journalist, that s the brightest of all lines. information johnists learn in off had the of-record conversations, absolutely cannot be shared. it s one of the few unbreakable rulings in the business. everybody in the business knows that but because she work forward donald trump, phil rut berlindi of the washington post, decided to casually break that rule. according to multiple sources he shared her remarks worthies. she was immediately desired as we said, humail aited. rutger, meanwhile, returned to washington the here o. in fact, he was happily yapping away on msnbc this afternoon want his boss at the washington post issue aid statement, telling the rest of us what, a great guy he is. has something changed the past couple of weeks? is off the record a category that you no long verto observe?
served. and you start talking, thinking you can tile trust the people that you re with. in this case, it s a means to an end. no one cares madeline westerhaus was burned here by someone. they only care about the message, which i of cree organizations like the washington post, which are pure political, designed to effect political outcomes. they don t care about individuals, they don t care about the rules. they just care about power. and i think there should be, i mean, you just said it. it s a fireable offense to break this room do you think any chance phil rut berlindi will be fired from the washington post. no. of course not. they would vanished a statement talking about t. obviously, they are backing him. and why would you burn this source if they re openly talking about him. the only thing i could think of