Im pleased to be speaking with judge amul thapar, who sits the u. S. Court of appeals for the sixth circuit. His new book, his first book, is titled the peoples Justice Clarence thomas and the constant fictional stories that define him. Judge departure, thanks for joining us. John thank you for having me. So lets start out with why you decided to write about justice in particular. There are several members of the court that espouse originalism and theyre jurists, prudence. Why Justice Thomas . John, i originally trying to just in originalism. So my goal was to write in excess possible interesting originalism book is in is you know as an author is someone who writes a lot you often throw out your first draft and what i discover in that in drafting i kept coming back to justice. I thought his brand of originalism called the original public, meaning originalism, was one where he consistently his entire career laid out what i was an original a purely vision of the constant tution and the l
Internet providers. We are just getting started, building 100,000 miles of new infrastructure to reach those who need it most. Charter communication support cspan as a public service, along with these other Television Providers giving you a front row seat to democracy. Now on book tvs Author Interview program afterwards u. S. Court of appeals judge discusses the judicial philosophy of Supreme Court Justice Clarence thomas and recounts some of the justices key opinions, he is interviewed by u. S. Today Supreme Court. Afterwards is a weekly Interview Program with guest hosts interviewing top nonfiction authors about their latest works. Sits the u. S. Court of appeals for the sixth circuit. His new book, his first book, is titled the peoples Justice Clarence thomas and the constant fictional stories that define him. Judge departure, thanks for joining us. John thank you for having me. So lets start out with why you decided to write about justice in particular. There are several members of
Of the justices key opinions. The Supreme Court corresponded. Afterwards is a weekly Interview Program with relevant guesthouse interviewing top authors about their latest work. I am pleased to be speaking with the judge who sits on the u. S. Court of appeals for the sixth circuit. His new book is titled the peoples justice. Clarence thomas in the constitutional story that divide him. Thanks for joining us. Thank you for having me. Lets start out with why we can start with justice in particular. Why Justice Thomas . I was originally trying to write an original is a book. Writing in exceptional book. As you know as an author, someone who writes a lot you often throw out your first draft. Drafting that i kept going back to Justice Thomas. One where he consistently throughout his entire career laid out what i thought was an original, purely originalist vision of the constitution and laws that govern us. And doing that i thought it was a way to tell a story through one justices ive. The ot
Judge amul thapar, who sits the u. S. Court of appeals for the sixth circuit. His new book, his first book, is titled the peoples Justice Clarence thomas and the constant fictional stories that define him. Judge departure, thanks for joining us. John thank you for having me. So lets start out with why you decided to write about justice in particular. There are several members of the court that espouse originalism and theyre jurists, prudence. Why Justice Thomas . John, i originally trying to just in originalism. So my goal was to write in excess possible interesting originalism book is in is you know as an author is someone who writes a lot you often throw out your first draft and what i discover in that in drafting i kept coming back to justice. I thought his brand of originalism called the original public, meaning originalism, was one where he consistently his entire career laid out what i was an original a purely vision of the constant tution and the laws that govern us. And so in d
Book tv is unfi twitter and facebook. And government decided to get more tax revenue if we got rid of these lower middleclass home replace them with highrises, restaurants and Office Spaces for the private Company Pfizer so they took the home away using their eminent do main power under the constitution, and, of course, when the homeowners objected they said you cant take away our Property Rights, you have to use the public use thats what the constitution says. It says you can use Eminent Domain power for the highway, like a highway a military base, a post office, expanding road there are lots of public uses that we can think of. But of course one thing we know public use doesnt mean it is private use and picking away private property using it a private Company Seems like a private juice so they have it up to the United States Supreme Court and shockingly the court said it was perfectly fine to take away these private homes to give away to a private company because public use was the p