marked classified ts sci, which refers to top secret sensitive compartmented information. also found, four sets of top secret staff comments. three sets of secret documents and three sets of confidential documents. a total of 11 sets of classified records. three laws are also listed as a legal basis for the warrant. one is part of the espionage act. and while that has a lot of people jumping to conclusions and conjuring up visions of spies, it is important to note the espionage act encompasses a lot more than just that. it makes it a crime to remove or misuse information related to national defence. also listed, a law forbidding hiding or destroying classified material, and another makes it illegal to destroy or falsify evidence in an investigation. former solicitor general neal katyal explained why that last one is very significant. that is the one that probably does require an inside source, a mueller something like that working with the fbi. otherwise, it s hard for me to
and being the saudis now starting up this, you know, tournament of their own, and this sports washing that they re doing, trying to buy respect on the world stage, trying to improve their image, just be truthful, you know, just work with the truth instead of hiding behind lies. that s how you gain respect. you can t buy it. you have to earn it. terry, wonderful to have you this morning. thank you so much for speaking with us. thank you for having me. and new day continues right now. welcome to our viewers in the united states and all around the world. it is wednesday, june 15th. i m john berman with brianna keilar. and new this morning, president biden taking on big oil, demanding immediate action from seven major oil companies to boost supplies. in a letter to the companies, he slams their high profit margins, and insists they are not acceptable when americans are paying record prices at the pump. the president blames the oil companies for blunting the impact of
during the winter for heat, rather than using it for non heat electricity. nuclear has the ability to scale up over the coming decade really faster than any other way, other than relying on petro dictators for fossil fuels. but seth, i m wondering what sort of timescales are we talking about here? because nuclear power stations notoriously take years to build. and, let s be frank, they can cost a fortune. well, firstly, what we re talking about when we re talking about keeping plants open that are slated to close soon is something that can be done immediately. and then we could look at plants that have been closed relatively recently, particularly in germany, that perhaps could be reopened, and other plants that over the coming couple of years might have been slated to close that could either keep operating or actually go through power uprates to increase the amount of power that come out of existing plants. and when we look at the reasons why nuclear plants have been delayed, have gon
electricity. nuclear has the ability to scale up over the coming decade really faster than any other way other than relying on petro dictators for fossil fuels. but seth, i m wondering what sort of timescales are we talking about here? because nuclear power stations notoriously take years to build. and let s be frank, they can cost a fortune. well, what we re talking about when we re talking about keeping plants open that are slated to close soon is something that can be done immediately. and then we could look at plants that have been closed relatively recently, particularly in germany, that perhaps could be reopened and other plants that over the coming couple of years might have been slated to close that could either keep operating or actually go through power up rates to increase the amount of power that come out of existing plants. and when we look at the reasons why nuclear plants have been delayed, have gone over budget, they re not due to the nuclear part of the reactor.
while we are on that, what do you think is the long term future of these pipelines? do you think they will be fixed or is europe s use of russian gas now a thing of the past? i think russia has proven itself to be an unreliable energy partner. it used to be reliable. no more. no country wants to take the risk of putting a significant amount of its energy demand to russia s supply. it is clear, in fact this accelerates the eu s push to become energy independent through clean energy. they are building up their own home grown energy. i am here at the iaea conference, every country is looking at the risks associated with putting too many eggs in one basket or putting too many eggs in the basket of petro dictators and the volatility of the fossil fuels that accrue from that. everyone is looking at how i can become energy independent. we strongly suggest that should be through clean energy and all countries are