watching symone. a bad week for freedom, that s what democrats described the latest controversial decisions from the supreme court, one ruling opens the door for businesses to discriminate against the lgbtq+ community with the three or three we talk to colorado attorney general phil wiser about the case that originated in his state. when it comes to 2024 elections, most acute into the presidential race. what about the dozens of senate seats up for grabs and the governor mentions and lieutenants and a lot of states? we re launching a new series today talking to tenants explain the issues on the ballots, and first up is josh fine horse to beat the next governor of north carolina. plus our culture critics are going to weigh in on this bad incident. it s getting out of control. i am symone towns in, and i have something to say. on the last day of pride month, the supreme court delivered a decision with devastating consequences for the lgbtq+ community and the laws designe
not provide whether her services had been asked to provide wedding services to no one existed that wanted her to provide wedding services to a same-sex couple. i am not been penalized. she had not been penalized from the state of colorado for her intent to the 90 services. what i am saying is that the supreme court completely obscured it i did not know that they could do that. according to the initial petition, smith received an email at the day after she originally sued colorado in 2016, and the email read, quote, my name is stewart and my fiancée is mike. we are getting married early next year and we have some design work done for our invites, places, place names, et cetera. we also my stretch to a website. but journals at the new republic tracked down a stewart who had information that was the same as the state said in the filing, a heterosexual man already married. stewart told them, quote, i
wouldn t want anyone to make me a wedding website. i married, i have a child, i am not sure where that came from, but somebody is using false information in a supreme court filing document. the so-called alliance to defend freedom, which provided smith with legal assistance told the washington post that it was irrelevant whether smith actually received a legitimate request because you don t, quote, have to wait to be punished by the government to challenge and unjust a law. and the majority opinion written by justice neil gorsuch, the court said that some services such as what they design were inherently expressive and counted a speech. this is what they were. colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. her conscience. john this sonia sotomayor disagreed, writing and hurricane descent, today, the court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public, a
ballots, and first up is josh fine horse to beat the next governor of north carolina. plus our culture critics are going to weigh in on this bad incident. it s getting out of control. i am symone towns in, and i have something to say. on the last day of pride month, the supreme court delivered a decision with devastating consequences for the lgbtq+ community and the laws designed to protect all of us from discrimination. i do mean all of us. in the 63 decision, the court ruled and three other creative violinist that it website design or could legally refused to create wedding sites for same-sex couples. even imaginary ones, because at the time that she brought the suit, petitioner lori smith did