dame to rome he stayed in that villa and lived here. so that s the association with peter. not a burial, but he actually was active in this place. there s no disputing that these traditions were very, very strong. we have literary traditions, archaeological evidence, we have this graffiti. so we have a lot of circumstantial evidence, but nothing that ties us back to the exact time and place which we really need to say that peter was here in this place. it s controversial, but could science now provide that missing evidence? professor tom are relic hunters from oxford university. they aren t allowed access to the bones found e beneath the vatican, so they have tracked down two teeth believed to have come from peter to a a basilica in belgium. he thinks the relics were brought here from rome in the 7th century.