kristina kvive, thank you so much for joining us. nice to talk to you. thank you, katy. former fbi counter intelligence agent peter strouk gives me his take on the white house phone records next. s me he house phone records next that s why we build technology that makes it possible for every business. and every person. to come to the table and do more incredible things.
west. now, the opposition are hammering orban over the close relationship to vladimir putin, and he probably does have the closest ties to the russian president of any leader of a nato country. orban was actually in moscow just a couple of weeks before the election. we met earlier with peter, the head of the hungarian opposition, hoping to replace viktor orban as the prime minister of hungary. i asked him, how is the war next door impacting the election here. take a listen to what he had to say. the war is raging in ukraine next door, how big an issue is the war and the election here in hungary? it has become one of the biggest issues, most important issues. for orban who has been waging war for five years against homosexuals, against migrants, all of a sudden he represents
that he trump specifically had done anything wrong? peter strouk. without getting into details that are classified or in the context of ongoing investigation my concern based on credible allegation that members of his campaign were actively colluding with the government of russia struck me at o extraordinary threat to america. and represented interruption with a question. well you had already and he finishes represented the most unbelievably superiority and reprehensible sort of behavior that any american could engage in. oh, so even if it wasn t at that point in the investigation the prospect that trump himself was colluding it was people in his campaign. the prospect that he would get elected while people with his campaign were colluding with the russian government in order to get the russian government to help install trump in the oval office, that would be the most unbelievably superiority and reprehensible sort of behavior that any american could engage
white house they had basically flipped people close to him. why would you think that would be bad? they have this whole back and forth about it. at the end of it you can see in strouk s own words rather than republican characterizations of it why he would have been to f-ing terrified with the prokt of the elects. what did you mean by f-ing terrifying. peter strouk. question what you did mean by f-ing terrifying. peter strouk that the prospect that candidate trump might be elected president. in november when you said twos f-ing terrifying for him to become the president you were investigating wlornd whether or not he had colluded or coordinated or conspiracied with a foreign actor to interfere with the election. the the ails made a public- being careful not to step on open investigations but the ails made public are allegations that members of trump s campaign may have been doing that. question: then why in the world would you be tag talking about impeachment if you did not
charges against james comey and hillary clinton. so what do they do, they bring james comey before the committee. they ask questions about hillary clinton that this is their last time that they can get a bite on that bone that they have been chewing on for two years. if you were to compare james comey s public testimony versus this closed door testimony, what was his tone, what was his cadence, how did he do? james comey is a very intelligent, very organized individual. he did not differ any from his testimony he s given in public or from his book. he said there was no bias that was cause for change of policy or activities of the fbi or the justice department in any of the investigations. while there was obvious intent by peter strouk and lisa page,