Even though theyre facing such problems, they still utilize two agendas. The Constitutional Foundation and Legal Framework of the to full theform, public. Were disappointed with their strategy. We urge the government to be brave and face the issues. In, Islamic State militants battle Kurdish Forces in a city among the border directly on the border with turkey. Kurds say they have slowed the militants advance to the city of kobani. Unitednetta says the states needs to look at Islamic State as a real threat to the country. He spoke with charlie rose. I view this, charlie, as a continuum from 9 11. 9 11, we declared war on terrorism because of the attack they made on our country. I think when you look at the broad sweep of terrorism, isis is another piece to that. They are intent on attacking this country as well. I think we have to view this in that larger context. Technology space, and other tech company on the verge of splitting up, cording to people familiar with the matter. Symantec
And parked cars at night and come out of school with no debt. The level of the education of the site is part of a 12. If a student goes to school and learned to close to is for, the student has contributed and should be paid. What do you call a person against room and board for their work . Slaves. Thats a lot like the slaves in the workplace and all capitalism where half the wage is fully half. Surplus value and is ripped off by the capitalist own industry. We start with a rip off a system in every part of our society that has to be corrected, not just the education part. People should be paid to go to school and it comes out of the social fund we pay for kindergarten. Moderator do you have any idea how much that would cost . Diamondstone does not matter. Because once we change to a system that is socialist in the economy, people have money to spend because they havent been ripped off half their salary. Moderator if you know. We are at the top of the out and youre watching the google
When we are doing automatic adjustments . With that said i think it would be an improvement however we did it so if we to indexing when it came to when it came to individual parameters that would make sense as well. One thing i would notice we should be sure to index both the benefit side and the revenue side as in fact Peter Diamond suggests. To be critical of such an automatic mechanism would not simply be solvency. Our Current System would probably be made solvent. Congress will just get around to it later and focus changes on later generations. So the idea here is to spread the adjustment of properly and especially to share risk across generations but i also dont mean to suggest this is the way we will get to solvency from where we are today. Right now congress and the president do need to agree eventually a compromise. The point is we can build on these kinds of mechanisms and to compromise legislation so as to preserve the dealer has made an spread risks across generations rather
That discussion for davids i think we really have to all think very seriously about it not just in our normal thinking about longterm fiscal policy that we have had for the last 25, 30 years but in terms of what has happened in fiscal and Monetary Policy in the last seven or eight years. So on one hand i think much of the premise of what we did in the 90s was precautionary savings. You can see that we have to project not only that you might have a down turn but that you might need a stimulus effort and what that does. The other side of that, though, is that to look at the other extreme, germany, where a bias towards this has been one of the most harmful things in the world. And where i just think that in fact, i believe that we have some Great Central bankers here, that we are seeing heroic efforts by bernanke, kohn and others, draghi. They are efforts that are exceptional things that Monetary Policy has to do because fiscal policy has completely failed in europe, is trying not to fail
Some way going forward. That may or may not be clear. It may get up to the Supreme Court in the next few years. I think yesterday the 4th circuit heard a case heard oral argument on a case whether south side data is protected. 5th circuit says it is not protected. These are issues working their way up to the Supreme Court. I think in general justices tepid to be relatively sensitive to how Technology Changes privacy and this is a theme if you look back, the thermal imaging case from 2000. Jones versus united states, the gps case from 2012. Then riley versus california in just this past year this year. Those are all cases where if you just look at the case law, the precedents, you assume the government won would win. Those are all three cases where in fact the government lost. In jones and in riley they lost unanimously. Justices i think republican generally attuned to these concerns and lower courts as well. Were seeing Fourth Amendment law evolve. If we had a functioning congress, i t