family that goes all the waypren to the top , potentially of president biden. if joe scarborough is interested in the truth and understanding why we talk understak abokabout this, look t on the laptop. all right, julian , i l ju. go . tht go with where we just went. i mean, the truth is that itwasj . wasn t just about the laptop. where we are now is we have a a whistleblower who is saying w that a senior person iann the is who s saying, i want political whistleblower protection because i can prove not because i haveth a political agenda, bun with documents, emails, ete cetera, that this case is notha being handled the way other cases are being handled. irsg in the irs, meaning hunte biden. and we also norew know that more biden family members are benefiting from the millionss that are coming from overseas. i the thing that we alwayswah have to point ouavt is the bidee story is not really about hunter biden in the sense of the national news media. the only reason thiss is a topc at
it s enjoyed by many big tech giants because supposedly they don t involve themselves in editorial, but in reality they do. this section 230 is a legal liability shield and it protects these platforms they are not content providers anymore, they are editors from being held liable for the content posted by their users, but they edit. but other twitter, facebook, youtube, et e cetera, are all editorializing content with so-called fact-checkers and everything. fact checks the fact-checkers? and warning labels even suspensions for things they deem inaccurate even when they re wrong or not up to their political standards, then w shouldn t these tech companies be treated like any other news editorial outlet?ld after all, even fake news cnn, msdnc, the three broadcast networks, new york times, washington post, they don t fall under the section 230 umbrella. they don t have that liability protection.
Chicago
Baby, What a Big Surprise
Dialogue, Pt. 2 - Chicago, Lamm, Robert
No Tell Lover
Old Days - Chicago, Pankow, James
If You Leave Me Now
Questions 67 & 68 - Chicago, Lamm, Robert
Happy Man
Re-Release Date: 2/28/1995
Album Type: Original recording reissued (2 out of 5 stars) The year of this CD s original release (1981) was Chicago s floundering year. CBS dropped them after signing a seven-year deal in 1980, while their future label, Full Moon, had only released the first Peter Cetera solo album. Greatest Hits Vol. II represents how much the group meant to Columbia then. It is cut, pasted, and badly tossed together to reflect the band s falling fortune.Don t be fooled by the top-selling ballads (the 1976 #1 If You Leave Me Now and its 1977 follow-up, Baby What A Big Suprise. ) The rest of the disc flounders with one song too many from Hot Streets, and half of the epic Dialogue (that couldn t have been extended considering the potential length of