Programs. They spoke against it. Listen to the concerns of the San Francisco health department. Thank you. And after the last speaker that ive called ryan indigo kitty chang, wendy wong and miss something kwong i dont know. Good afternoon, everybody. Thanks for hearing us again on an important topic. I want to put my support for the im david mccarthy, im the Owner Operator of a small nonconforming cultivation site here in San Francisco. I wanted to support the citywide policy in San Francisco. I want think we should approach this as a whole city. Id like to put my support behind the 600 square foot distance, i think that is a large distance. I think its an easily supportable distance. I want to talk a little bit about myself. Weve been talking about access. Ive heard a lot about the mcds and access to patient. What about the access to the mcds for their product and the cultivators. Im a small nonconforming cultivator. Although i take the leap and hope to make the transition in deregula
Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve
Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve
Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve
Its currently amended by the planning domestic called the hub project to better reflect the needs of one of the most dense and transitrich areas in the city. The hub project provides us an opportunity to better ensure that the areas growth supports the citys goal for housing, transportation, the public realm and the arts. Recent ri there was a, ceqa appeal of a highrise in the district. And a current iteration of the plan, developers can seek additional parking with additional use permit and through one oak was granted a c. U. For their parking. It brought to light an important part about parking and it relates to cumulative impacts along the hub. As long as our city grows, buildings get built and our neighborhoods get more dense, the more crowded our streets get and the more impacted our services become. All of these developments for all this new parking has a cumulative impact. We know it and we see it. Yet the guidelines that we use to measure impact say there isnt a significant imp