Security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. Reduce that youre welcome to a conference on how low you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing is not everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels or plan is true and that the whole cold version reflects its understanding that hong kong to russia which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is goi
Security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. I. Think you know that youre welcome to a conference on hello you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that china is going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but you are taking a huge gamble backing this law onto because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations to choose obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels like is true and that the whole cold version reflects its understanding that hong kong need to version which is consistent with our common law system thats why
A try. Its. A very warm welcome from all of us here in moscow that is r. C. International with me we care and lets begin with the latest figures on covert 19 the Global Pandemic is still raging with 2700000 cases now confirmed the number of states how tis has the past 191000 but over 750000 people have recovered. New. Current a virus that isnt the only thing thats spreading during this pandemic conspiracy theories about the origins of covert 19 have swarmed the internet aunties caleb maupin looks at why they gaining so much traction. The coronavirus can demick is opening up weird new horizons for online conspiracy theorists the virus was bioengineered in a lab by scientists to be used as a weapon or a form of population control this is a theory the form of politician Bronwyn Bishop has also suggested it is to get rid of nonproductive chinese in the Chinese Community in the words of george that is who should be eliminated. So they dont have to be but its getting beyond just talk hashtag
800743cnbc or jimcramer i love billy paul, but only the strong survive is the wrong anthem for age of covid19, but i do think thats where were headed and even after a good day like this one, and the s p climbed 1. 91 s and thing is the average is dominated by the fittest stocks and the ones with the strongest Balance Sheets and they will do so where most commerce when most commerce is on hiatus, and theyll still be there, but other companies lesser known, but still in the s p 500 need credit to make it through, not because theyre reckless and poorly managed, but because its impossible to plan for this economic catastrophe and including, of course, all of the small and midsized businesses that are not even public im worried that theyre doomed. Doomed ive said endlessly that we dont trade in nail salons and gyms although we do have Planet Fitness on the show later tent, and there are plenty companies that i supply midsized businesses and more important if we keep seeing jobless numbers a
So apple will capitulate on privacy in china. In ways that it would not dream of doing in the us. It is certainly subject to political pressure, differences in ways Different Companies regulated and will not fight beijing on these things. There are a couple other problems with apple that overlap problems with google and facebook. One is in terms of who gets what part of the innovation pie. One of the arguments when regulators say these companies are too big, we need to bring them to heal, make him smaller, break them up, they say this is a battle between regulation and innovation. I would argue these companies, apple is foremost among them, are implementers, not innovators. They are implementers of pretty much other peoples technology. You can see this playing out, there is a great story and headlines, the google battle and so now has a the to pick with a small innovator, a guy came up with a way to make smart speakers, very innovative company, came up a lot of technologies adapted by