good name against this outrageous smear conducted in conjunction with senate democrats. who among us would not have been outraged by having a lifetime record drug through the mud with accusations that cannot be proven and a blatant attempt to decide on the part of at least some senate democrats that the presumption of innocence no longer applies in this country. what kind of person couldn t have been upset about that? they claim he spoke too forcefully in defense of himself after being accused of such
he aggressively defended his good name against this outrageous smear conducted in conjunction with senate democrats. who among us would not have been outraged by having a lifetime record drug through the mud with accusations that cannot be proven? and a blatant attempt to decide on the part of at least some senate democrats that the presumption of innocence no longer applies in this country. what kind of person couldn t have been upset about that? they claim he spoke too forcefully in defense of himself after being accused of such
where murder is exceedingly rare. said detective phil giles. it s not a common occurrence of homicide. how did it hit you and members of the department? you have a victim and then a child. the child, of course, that always touches you in a different way. excuse me. because it s a 3-year-old child. these things do touch you personally, don t they? yeah. outside, the curious onlookers were a beat behind. all they knew is that ann charles and her little boy were no more. it s just devastated me. i was in shock, especially about that little boy. yeah. still didn t know what had happened, really. it wasn t long though. watching the silent stern faces streaming in and out of that little house. a person couldn t help but put two and two together. it was very scary and i think the whole neighborhood was scared.
now we have a new crop of documents they want. do you think they will meet the september deadline or will we be saying you just saw comey e-mails? morgan: first, thank god for judicial watch. there is so much that judicial watch has done in this process that would not have came to light if it wasn t for them. including this round, right? it s known perhaps to congress but it s not known to us. we wouldn t be talking about it on the couch today. do i think the d.o.j. would slow walk it? i m sure they would like to. if it comes out, we are getting close to the election. are people going to try to use it for the political means? i think you hit the nail on the head. when it comes to the f.b.i. and what i have been saying most someone who works with the people in the f.b.i., the american people need to trust the institution. they need to trust there is no politics involved and everything that is happening came out over the past two years stinks. i think that we you couldn t have said i
single thing about it. they brought zero charges related to russia. a whole host of charges related to things they did before they ever met president trump. so if i am in the trump defense camp i look at this like well, i mean, if this is what mueller has how are we still talking about this? morgan: to me what is interesting about learning about manafort s lavish lifestyle and getting in debt and having to lie, cheat and steal, this is like russian espionage 101. they saw him and they are like this is who we are going for. he is in debt. he has to keep up things around washington and money around the world. so an intelligence target no surprise reading this and hearing the trial why the russians honed him on him. harris: it s interesting. you talk about the president looking for loyalty. look at the person close to him on the campaign. that person couldn t have been more of a friend and said you know you need me but there is