something in court in a filing or in person. but they didn t say anything. no. they ve been saying everything on cable and on twitter and in other venues. they ve not done they had someone there, as you said, christina bobb, who was one of the people at the search, she was there when the fbi was searching. and look, you ve seen them say in some of these appearances on various networks, they ve said that they want to know who these witnesses were, they want to know who dropped the dime on the former president. and i get it. that s obviously anybody would want that. that is not something that the judge is going to allow. right? but the problem is as elie s pointing out, it depends on how you do these redactions. we have seen redacted versions of these documents and, you know, have been able to figure things out. we probably even in the unredacted versions, right, don? there wouldn t be names of witnesses. but it will say, you know, person a or person 1a or
ways in which this office can be misused. what s the example, in the pre-trump era, of a typical election day moment, where a secretary of state might have to issue some kind of clarification to election workers? maybe if someone is showing up, we saw this in 2020, trying to intimidate voters or block their ability, interfere with the professional work of election workers, simply checking a voter in, giving them a ballot. if people show up and say, don t get that person a ballot, i m challenging them because i don t like their last name. but you can challenge someone just because you don t like their last name. but again, it requires us to rapidly respond to issues like that, as they occur. we ve also had candidates this year, advise, observers, or even voters to go in and pull out the plug of election machines. if they don t like what they see. that s the type of thing that the secretary of state, working with local clerks can proactively work to ensure this doesn t happen, by tra
maybe if someone is showing up, we saw this in 2020, trying to intimidate voters or block their ability, interfere with the professional work of election workers, simply checking a voter in, giving them a ballot. if people show up and say, don t get that person a ballot, i m challenging them because i don t like their last name. but you can t challenge someone just because you don t like their last name. but again, it requires us to rapidly respond to issues like that, as they occur. we ve also had candidates this year, advise, observers, or even voters to go in and pull out the plug of election machines. if they don t like what they see. that s the type of thing that the secretary of state, working with local clerks can proactively work to ensure this doesn t happen, by training our clerks to respond, if and when something like that happens. just today, we facilitated a meeting with law enforcement officials throughout the state, the attorney generals office and local election offic
friends, family, cousins, uncles, we know one the governor telling me one of the people killed was simply trying to buy cup cakes for his son s brother. a grandmother who devoted her life to service, she ran a food pantry for a quarter cinch ri. we talked about the security guard who confronted bravely the suspect. he s now being hailed as a hero. another person a driver who was shot and killed in the parking lot as he was trying to help someone put groceries in the car. so an absolutely atrocious act of hate and one that you had mentioned is being investigated as a hate crime. we re watching the rainfall there. it seems appropriate. talk to me about the mood in the community there today. it s very somber here in buffalo and eerie county. what we re seeing is a community that s reeling. we re trying to come together to start the healing process. but we re shocked that an individual from outside our