they had court-appointed justices. it was a different makeup of the court. justice clarence thomas disagreed. it s the full truth that the supreme court never ruled the merits, and more and more information is coming out every day out of arizona, georgia, pennsylvania, wisconsin. yeah, there s information coming out. let me ask you like this as well. i understand that you have the right to advocate for your believes and your client. is that s why you re here. when you say alternate electors, that s your view of it. of course, you also understand there are open probes including in georgia that prosecutors mike look at differently. you understand if you were aiding and abetting in fraudulent elections or voter fraud, that not only is that potentially against the law, but you would lose the lawyer client privilege for your client in the trump campaign. first of all, ari, i don t think you re the one who s going to be determining or the audience whether there was any perpetration of
fraud was absolutely done and it was done by the democrats, the left, marc elias, and others, and that perpetration was on the american people. that s why it s shown over 50% of the americans believe there was fraud in the 2020 election. it was substantial, 47-41. the fraud changed results in the 20 election. so, ari, everything is that was done was done legally by the trump legal team according to the rules and under the leadership of rudy giuliani. we fought for the truth, and the truth is that there was overwhelming fraud in the 2020 election, and i m doing everything possible within all the rules, laws, and regulation to make sure that the truth comes out. part of what you said is false, but we re going to move forward. i mentioned the reporting about this proposed draft order that may have come from a trump lawyer in the transit documents according to the supreme court law, 8 to 1 this week ha says there was an idea of appointing a special counsel to have the
one guard began to cry, and shake, uncontrollably when, i quote, the eyes of all of the inmates he, had executed began flashing before him. and of quote. ambassador, do the eyes of ukrainian children, women, and elderly, killed by the russians, flash before you? if they do, you may consider how to sponsor a decision to help you deal with perpetration, inducted traumatic stress. you can see while amidst the ground and cruelty of this war, there is no real diplomacy to be had. one major factor, that could influence progressive negotiations, one where the other, is where china stands on
overnight in 2019. they said he perpetrated a fake-hate crime against himself for media attention. now, his attorney, mr. uche, shot back. he went after these two brothers that we have heard a lot about, that were friends with smollett. in particular, one of them was his trainer. and we heard from the defense attorney that he basically called them the liars. saying that they are the ones that were paid for something else and lied about being taking part in this at the direction of mr. smollett. he called them a lot of other names, as well. but really, went after the o-san dar yoe brothers because those brothers, along with police, were the ones who said, look, this was fake hate crime. we were responsible for the perpetration of this game but it was smollett who planned it. the jury will have to take all of the information they have learned from surveillance video to police body-camera video when they went in to talk to mr.
arrest must occur immediately after the perpetration of the offense or in the case of felonies during escape. if the observer fails to make the arrest immediately after the commission of the offense or during escape in the case of felonies, his power to do so is extinguished. a private person may arrest an offender upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion, that is, on probable cause, which is defined as facts and circumstances that are sufficient to warrant a prudent person or one of reasonable caution in believing in the circumstances shown that the suspect has committed an offense. the facts necessary to establish probable cause for arrest are much less than those required to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. the test merely requires a probability, less than a certainty, but more than a mere suspicion or possibility.