a certain spiral of impunity that russia is allowed to perpetrate. it has violated, actually, more than 400 various international agreements, conventions and there is no way to influence russia, so i think those countries who want to in a way have collaborative relationships around the world have to sit down and think how to reform the un security council, other institutions, the council of europe, organisation for security and co operation in europe, i don t think we should give up on these small collaterals simply because one country has turned rogue. so you believe that the un is still fit for purpose? well, i think the un has to, in a way, reform, but it is so difficult. i think the un really is in doubt with the power of its members, so it is up to countries, members, the united kingdom, ukraine, france, india, indonesia, what do they want from the un? and i think if we get enough majority and consensus in the world,
against humanity, it so important to actually tell the story of who is the perpetrator and he was the victim. , , .., victim. president zelensky call lasted for the victim. president zelensky call lasted for the security - victim. president zelensky call lasted for the security council| victim. president zelensky call. lasted for the security council to be dissolved. but that s unlikely to happen, isn t it? be dissolved. but that s unlikely to happen. isn t it? happen, isn t it? absolutely. i think once happen, isn t it? absolutely. i think once this happen, isn t it? absolutely. i think once this war happen, isn t it? absolutely. i think once this war is - happen, isn t it? absolutely. i think once this war is over, i l happen, isn t it? absolutely. i- think once this war is over, i think there will have to be a serious rethinking about what in the first place. there is a impunity that russia is allowed to perpetrate. it is violated more than 400 various international agreeme
i think once this war is over, i think there will have to be a serious rethinking about what led to it in the first place, because let s remember there s a certain spiral of impunity that russia is allowed to perpetrate. it has violated, actually, more than 400 various international agreements, conventions and there is no way to influence russia, so i think those countries who want to in a way have collaborative relationships around the world have to sit down and think how to reform the un security council, other institutions, the council of europe, organisation for security and co operation in europe, i don t think we should give up on these small collaterals simply because one country has turned rogue. so you believe that the un is still fit for purpose? well, i think the un has to, in a way, reform, but it is so difficult. i think the un really is in doubt with the power of its members,
probably broken in trump s handling of the mara lago documents. remember for that search warrant to have been executed at mara lago, a showing of probable cause would have had to have been made to the court. judge howell s ruling is not a guarantee of trump being charged, but it might be a sign that the documents case is a much bigger problem for trump than paying for stormy daniels. silence. the cover up is often worse than the crime, right? in the documents case, it may turn out that notes from trump s lawyer could reveal a plan and or action by the former president to cover up and or perpetrate improper conduct regarding classified documents. and that will make the case much more about obstruction. then the murky no harm, no foul him to defenses. and the federal case seems to have gained steam. now soon, jack smith. is going to have to make a rather binary decision. did donald trump break the law and cannot be proven?
paying for stormy daniels. silence. the cover up is often worse than the crime, right? in the documents case, it may turn out that notes from trump s lawyer could reveal a plan and or action by the former president to cover up and or perpetrate improper conduct regarding classified documents. and that will make the case much more about obstruction. then the murky, no harm, no foul him to defenses. and the federal case seems to have gained steam. soon jack smith. is going to have to make a rather binary decision. did donald trump break the law and cannot be proven? he ll make a recommendation to aggie merrick garland based on the evidence. but garland is not obligated to act upon smith s recommendation. garland has what s called prosecutorial discretion. as pointed out by the new york times. what s that ? it s a power by prosecutors in the american justice system at both the state and federal level