Item 5 report back from the finance and Planning Committee from today. Thank you. I am sure commissioner chung would have been pleased today in our reports on the monthly contracts we were able to get some outcomes. The outcomes were quite satisfactory. On the block of the monthly contracts that included the Fountain Institute that is actually a Diversion Program and then several programs that actually were looking at improving employment from the university of california and the positive Resource Center. We spoke somewhat at the positive Resource Center if that information was getting back to primary providers in a way that they may find it useful to understand how their clients were assisted beyond the medical illness. We heard request for a retroactive contract with the San Francisco Community Health authority, San Francisco health plan, administering the San Francisco covered mri program. It is a contract that goes back four years. Because of the changes of funding in which the Ser
There is frustration and confusion about the past year. In response to the changes made in areas of homelessness and Behavioral Health issues in San Francisco we request the next three meeting including the following relevant items. Today we will discuss the presentation. Next meeting whole Person Care Initiative to address the needs of the highest utilizers of Public Health services. On the fifth of november a broad update. We are concerned about the health and wellbeing of those in San Francisco. We take our role seriously and we will continue to use our meetings as a public forum to discuss important Public Health issues. Members of the public are always invited to attend and provide input. I am mark. Health commission secretary. If you have Public Comment, please hand a slip to me. If you would consider today, there are a lot of people who feel passionately about what you are here for. As others speak, they may have different opinions than you, try to be respectful. Be silent in yo
Which are the urgent needs of people in crisis. Thats correct. That is a pretty fair summary. Commissioner green. I want to echo that. I am impressed by your honesty. He appreciate you educated us and your passion means a great deal and your wisdom means more. I guess the question is a request that i might have. I am confused how if we are embarking on this truly aspirational effort to identify the 4,000 homeless in San Francisco and concentration of 250 how when we find and identify them we can give them the best conveyor car best ce and service. We need to place them where they need to be placed. It seems that will not be successful that we havent analyzed the need. [please stand by] the first thing that i would say is that ive been mightily impressed how this department operates in crisis. I think that its been mentioned before how so many leading accomplishments across this country has been done by this department. And i witnessed how incredible this system has turned on a dime to
Clerk. No eating or drinking in the chamber, please. Items today will appear on the october 8th agenda unless otherwise stated. Supervisor mandelman thank you. Can you please call the first item. Clerk hearing to analyze and understand the city progress in meeting the requirements and goals of propsis t. Lessons learned from the citys efforts to achieve treatment on demand and challenges to current efforts to expand access to treatment for Substance Use disorder. Supervisor mandelman i want to thank the providers, advocates and drug policy experts who have pushed the city. The members of the coalition have been on the front lines for many years. I thank them to bring this hearing forward. It was more than two decades ago this board passed the resolution authored by the supervisor adopting drug treatment on demand fo for indigent san franciscans. The average wait was 60 days and the citiesty mated 12,000 of the 45,000 in need of treatment was receiving it. In 2008 voters passed proposit
And President Trump wants federal agencies to work with social Media Companies to stamp out hate. But first, uber shares continue to fall after sales miss and a 5. 2 billion dollar loss in the second quarter. Much is due to the ipo in may. Cooper is trying to reassure investors, saying losses will come down over the next two years. Why such a dramatic reaction . Eric i think the stock reaction had to do with the revenue mix. If you are going to lose that much money, you have to keep growing. A 5 billion plus net loss is huge. That has to do with the stock tied to the ipo, but uber loses money regularly, although it did beat expectations. Emily are investors generally buying that this is a once in a lifetime of a company fix . Eric that narrative is challenged. I think if they were holy buying that, we would see uber above its ipo price. Analyst remain optimistic about uber. Many have buy ratings for the company, but there is a lot of Short Interest in the stock and there is a lot of sk