do they care about any of the racist rhetoric from biden that we just played? do they care that his son has used the n word and made many anti asian slurs himself that just became revealed in the lasi few weeks. or does none of this matter to the new york times or the rest of the media mob just t because joe biden is a democrat he gets a pass. now, ultimately most on the left, they don t really care about racism, only if they can politicize it. politicize it. get to politicize it. for them it s a means to an end. on the left, race is a political tool. they use it to take down their enemies. they give a pass to the peopleth that share theireo viewpoints. it s not clear that joe biden even understands any of this. he was quite a clearly strugglig again cognitively and now he does, you know, whatever his far left mind wanders asks of him. true to form they put joe ind a meeting today with a bunch of people he didn t seem to
have altered a document in connectioner with a removal application for a single warrant. my understandingle based on som very good reporting from the new york times and otherpo places is that theti president going to be proved entirely wrong.nt the notion that the leadership of the fbi engaged in politics, that they skewed their investigation to favor one candidate over another f that s not in this report by all accounts. we were talking the three of his spent a lot of time in the executive branch of government, what theec report shows is sh something that s not surprising to peopleth that spent a lot of time in the federal government, thatfe when you shine the light of almost three years inspector general investigation on a department, it s often more seasoned leaders that do conduct themselves as though their conduct will be scrutinized. i think frank is alluding to earlier reports that suggest there s an fbi lawyer who may be
it s important to have everyone rowingnt in the same direction d not to have any internal divisions within the white house. so we ll seean to what extent mulvaney, as well as pat siplioni can get on the same page because there has been reported tension between the two and were know the white house i very sensitive about all that reporting. hans, stand by for a second. tom hamburger who was one of the co-authors ofon this report we discussing joins us now from the washington post. tom, in your your story, you write that e-mails show vote and the omb staffers arguing that withholding aid was legal while officials atle the national security council and state department protested. omb lawyers said that it was legal to withhold the aid as long as they deemed it a temporary hold according to people familiar with review. what s the context of that? that that the idea is for those peopleth saying, hey, there s a danger this gets out here and people thinka it s no legal and the argumen
but yet, they put tremendous pressure on the people around them including ruining their lives and pursuing the criminal prosecution. there are criminal referrals that have been made that will go to the heart of peopleth being dishonest, utilizing their bias and abusing their power. i think the attorney general is going to undertake this end with american public will get answers. also, i think we need to change our laws. dan: i understand that you can t go out and physically handcuff someone. that is not your job, you are a legislator. you make referrals. i totally get that. but the frustration is, is there any pressure that we can put on the doj and people to do their jobs? it seems like these inequities are leading to a real imbalance. their public only matters if people have fidelity and believe the constitution means something. but it seems to mean something for one side, but mean absolutely nothing to the other side of the political debate. i guess my question better phrased is:
more american lives, it would cost more civilian lives across the region. it would worsen the refugee crisis with millions of peopleth fleeing to europe, further destabilizing there. to speake, of the fact that this would cost trillions of taxpayer dollars coming out of our pockets to go and pay for thiss endlessdo war that begs the question as a soldier, what are we fighting for? what does victory look like??qu tucker: what is the benefit to the united states? this is being pushed primarily by one man, the advisor john bolton, a president that has said he is not interested but john bolton clearly is. how do we benefit from this? is there an upside? we don t and that is the bottom line and what is so concerning. people say we don t want to go to war against iran, you look at