kind of odd unorthodox noejices. that is not what people in dc hear. it s not just that they don t except it. for the most parnlt they haven t heard about it. maybe the budget deficit is not a problem. it s barely in the washington discourse and because i m still in touch, i m really sort of out of it. why is there that distance? this is something that i think that s interesting is that, you know, people that are like like yourself that are making the case for a kind of mackerel economics, keynesian 101, have been relative to it and then it become this political question ultimately, right? the kind of policy question is fairly clear, at least from where you stand and from where i stand, so why is there the gap between mackerel economics 101 and what policy makers talk about? i think there are two things going on. one of which both of which are odd and disturbing.
what is the story? well, it is a story i chose. it is a story i chose. what she meant to say is what is the crappy story? who ever picked these stories is a powerful man. is a very powerful man. could crush you like a bug. might just do so after the show. andrew, is this why ugly guys get into politics because they are ugly? or is it the reverse? it is absolutely that s exactly now i am lost. is it a sign that our government has gotten too big that there are no beautiful women this washington? they shouldn t be that powerful. there should only be ugly people in dc, period. and frankly i don t care if they kill and devoure little boys if they stop spending my money. quite a stance. you made some interesting, but problematic [stances|instances]. stances. eat and devoure children.
to expand his wardrobe, somehow spend $655,000 on landscaping for his house in the hamptons. it comes as no surprise for anyone who has watched manafort operate but of course the legal system will make the final call on that. paul manafort is just the first in a series of people in dc who are suddenly in deep, deep trouble. who is next? reading between the lines of the indictment and talking to a number of our own sources we think we have a pretty good idea of that. today s indictment never mentioned donald trump s presidential campaign or the 2016 election. it only mentions russia in passing even though russian meddlingly was the pretext for the investigation. manafort s efforts to lobby on behalf of pro russia groups in ukraine. it goes into great detail on the relationship between manafort and two groups described as