i m at loss for words. i m not sure what the over/under is on the president invoking executive ilege. i would definitely bet the unde lo, anybody who has ever binge watched law and order recognizes that any privilege, pent tent priest, attorney/client, patient/doctor realizes number it is a shield, it s not a sword. and number two the burden is on the individual seeking to advance that privilege. as jill aptly pointed out anything that s been made public in any way, shape, or form or that falls outside of that discrete privilege is fair game. and what s important in this situation is that you have got someone like james comey, who comes from an environment in the fbi and law enforcement, and the u.s. attorney s office, where everything imaginable is ultimately documented. if you have lunch with one of your u.s.a. buddies. if you sit down with with a snitch, regardless what it is.
jill, that lessens his potential case? it does. frank lesion i think it s lessen by the fact that the allegation is that he asked mr. comey to stop investigating flynn. yeah. and that s an obstruction of justice. so it s not protected anyway. okay, brian, since a good lawyer is supposed to be able to argue that night is day, day is night, and sunny is cloudy, can you make the other case? make the case for president trump, if you would, that perhaps there s a way they can wiesel into an executive privilege claim? and you have used the operative word, brian, wiesel. it would take all of the wieseling that any bunch of wiesels could possibly come up with. this may be the one time when i m at loss for words. i m not sure what the over/under is on the president invoking executive privilege. i would definitely bet the under. look, anybody who has ever binge watched law and order recognizes that any privilege, pent tent priest, attorney/client,